FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 1145 vs A1N00

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 1145 and A1N00 are both aluminum grades. 1145 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) against 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) for A1N00, about 4.3 times as much; tensile strength follows at 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) vs 90 MPa (13.1 ksi). In exchange, A1N00 is the more ductile: elongation 38% versus 4% for 1145, and 1145 is harder (42 HB vs 23 HB). A1N00 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 100°C continuous). On the shop floor, 1145 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than A1N00 (standard, $$).

1145Choose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

A1N00Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

1145 vs A1N00: properties

1145A1N00

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

165 MPa23.9 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

150 MPa21.8 ksi
35 MPa5.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

4%
38%

Shear Strength

95 MPa13.8 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

60 MPa8.7 ksi
35 MPa5.1 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

42 HB
23 HB

Reduction in Area

—
80%

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 75 GPa10.9 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

646°C1,195 °F
643°C1,189 °F

Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 657°C1,215 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

230 W/m·K133 BTU/hr·ft·°F
222 W/m·K128 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
904 J/kg·K0.22 BTU/lb·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

100°C212 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-270°C-454 °F
-269°C-452 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 397 J/g171 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

60 % IACS
59 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.87×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.13 µΩ·in
2.92×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.15 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.84 V
-0.83 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
22 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
25%

Weldability

90 / 100
92 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
98 / 100

Castability

35 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
90 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

15%
20%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

61 kN·m/kg
33 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.6 MN·m/kg
25.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

163 kJ/m³
9 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

94.7 mm²/s
90.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

23
12

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1145A1N00

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1145A1N00
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

1145 vs A1N00 — frequently asked

Is 1145 stronger than A1N00?

Yes. 1145 has a typical yield strength of 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) against 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) for A1N00 — about 4.3 times as much. Tensile strength is 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) vs 90 MPa (13.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1145 or A1N00?

1145 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while A1N00 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 1145 or A1N00?

1145, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 22/100 for A1N00.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1145 and A1N00 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.