FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 1080 vs 1199

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 1080 and 1199 are both aluminum grades, both electrical conductive al. 1080 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 25 MPa (3.63 ksi) against 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) for 1199, about 108% more; tensile strength follows at 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) vs 45 MPa (6.53 ksi). In exchange, 1199 is the more ductile: elongation 50% versus 43% for 1080, and 1080 is harder (20 HB vs 13 HB). 1080 is stiffer (69 GPa vs 62 GPa).

1080Choose it when strength drives the design.

1199Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

1080 vs 1199: properties

10801199

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
62 GPa9 Msi

Shear Modulus

26 GPa3.8 Msi
25 GPa3.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

70 MPa10.2 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

25 MPa3.6 ksi
12 MPa1.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

43%
50%

Shear Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
35 MPa5.1 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

20 HB
13 HB

Hardness, Vickers

—
16 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 75 GPa10.9 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 20 MPa2.9 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

646°C1,195 °F
660°C1,220 °F

Liquidus Temperature

657°C1,215 °F
660°C1,221 °F

Same in both: Density 2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

231 W/m·K133 BTU/hr·ft·°F
243 W/m·K140 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Min Service Temperature

-270°C-454 °F
-269°C-452 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 397 J/g171 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

59.5 % IACS
64.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.14 µΩ·in
2.67×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.05 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
82 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.85 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
88 / 100

Castability

—
45 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 30% · Weldability 90 / 100 · Formability (cold) 98 / 100 · Polishability 95 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
230 MJ/kg98,882 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
14 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

26 kN·m/kg
17 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.6 MN·m/kg
23 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

5 kJ/m³
1 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

95.1 mm²/s
100 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
7

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale10801199

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability10801199
CNC machiningYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
DLCYes—

Both are offered for Sheet metal. They share 15 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating, PTFE Coating and 3 more.

1080 vs 1199 — frequently asked

Is 1080 stronger than 1199?

Yes. 1080 has a typical yield strength of 25 MPa (3.63 ksi) against 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) for 1199 — about 108% more. Tensile strength is 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) vs 45 MPa (6.53 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1080 or 1199?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 1080 or 1199?

1080, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 25/100 for 1199.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1080 and 1199 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.