FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 1050A vs 1145

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 1050A and 1145 are both aluminum grades. 1145 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) against 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) for 1050A, about 43% more; tensile strength follows at 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) vs 115 MPa (16.7 ksi). In exchange, 1050A is the more ductile: elongation 8% versus 4% for 1145, and 1145 is harder (42 HB vs 30 HB). 1050A runs hotter in service (120°C vs 100°C continuous). On the shop floor, 1145 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 1050A (standard, $$).

1050AChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

1145Choose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

1050A vs 1145: properties

1050A1145

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

115 MPa16.7 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

105 MPa15.2 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
4%

Shear Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

35 MPa5.1 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

30 HB
42 HB

Hardness, Vickers

34 HV
—

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 75 GPa10.9 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 646°C1,195 °F · Liquidus Temperature 657°C1,215 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

229 W/m·K132 BTU/hr·ft·°F
230 W/m·K133 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
100°C212 °F

Min Service Temperature

-269°C-452 °F
-270°C-454 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 397 J/g171 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

61 % IACS
60 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.83×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.11 µΩ·in
2.87×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.13 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.84 V · Corrosion Resistance 72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

32 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
45%

Weldability

92 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

78 / 100
40 / 100

Castability

30 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 15%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

43 kN·m/kg
61 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
25.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

80 kJ/m³
163 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

94.1 mm²/s
94.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

16
23

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale11451050A

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1050A1145
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Anodizing Type II—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chem Film (Alodine)—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE—Yes
Hard Anodizing Type III—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

1050A vs 1145 — frequently asked

Is 1145 stronger than 1050A?

Yes. 1145 has a typical yield strength of 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) against 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) for 1050A — about 43% more. Tensile strength is 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) vs 115 MPa (16.7 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1050A or 1145?

1145 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 1050A is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose 1050A over 1145?

Pick 1050A when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat. Pick 1145 when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1050A and 1145 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.