FabDigitFabDigit

Marking, decoration & colour · finish comparison

Laser Marking vs Pad Printing

Laser Marking and Pad Printing are both marking & decoration finishes; pad print is the lower-cost option ($).

Laser Marking on a machined part

Laser Marking

Marking & decoration · $ · instant quote

Laser marking uses focused fiber, CO2, or UV energy to create permanent text, logos, serials, UDI, and machine-readable codes.

Pad Printing on a machined part

Pad Printing

Marking & decoration · $ · instant quote

Pad printing transfers ink from an etched plate to a part with a flexible silicone pad.

When to choose which

Choose Laser mark

Choose Laser mark when for variable permanent data.

  • Creates variable serials and UDI without a physical printing tool
  • Supports about 0.10 mm minimum line width
  • Annealed colour-change marks add no depth; shallow engraving is typically 5–50 µm

Choose Pad print

Choose Pad print when for coloured graphics on curved plastic.

  • Prints on compound-curved and recessed geometry
  • Produces a typical 5–10 µm cured ink film
  • Supports a practical line width near 0.15 mm

What the numbers say

  • Pad print is the lower-cost option ($).
  • Pad print is the thinner coating (5–10 µm), so it disturbs tight fits less.

Scores side by side

Each score is 0–100 against every finish in this catalog. Corrosion is derived from salt-spray test duration and surface hardness from the finish layer's Vickers hardness where a measured figure exists; a finish that leaves the base metal's own surface is not rated for hardness. Cosmetic, lubricity and cost are FabDigit's engineering assessment. Scores and typical figures are screening data, not matched side-by-side tests or service-life rankings; ASTM B117 is a controlled salt-fog method, not a field-life prediction.

ScoreLaser markPad print
Corrosion resistance0 Minimal0 Minimal
Surface hardness / wear— —— —
Cosmetic quality70 Very good72 Very good
Lubricity10 Minimal10 Minimal
Cost18 $12 $
CorrosionHardnessCosmeticLubricityEconomy
Laser markPad print

Key numbers

PropertyLaser markPad print
Thickness0–50 µm5–10 µm
ElectricalUnchangedUnchanged
Coloursblack, white, grey, substrate contrast, limited colour effects on selected materialsblack, white, spot colours, custom colour
Relative costBudget ($)Budget ($)
Added lead time1–3 working days3–7 working days
RoHSCompliantCompliant
Instant quoteYesYes

Bold marks the side that is ahead on a row where more (or less, for cost and lead time) is better. Ranges are the typical specification window; the drawing call-out fixes the class.

Which materials take each finish

Material familyLaser markPad print
AluminumYesYes
BrassYesWith care
PolymerWith careYes
Stainless SteelYesYes
SteelYesYes
TitaniumYesLimited
CeramicWith care—
Copper AlloyWith careWith care
GlassWith careWith care
Magnesium AlloyWith careWith care
Zinc AlloyWith careWith care

Specifications and drawing call-outs

Laser mark

  • MIL-STD-130 — Identification Marking of U.S. Military Property

LASER MARK PER MIL-STD-130, DATA MATRIX ECC200, 6 × 6 MM, 0.10 MM MIN CELL, CONTRAST ≥ 30 %, GRADE 2.5 MIN PER ISO 15415

Pad print

  • ISO 2409 — Paints and Varnishes — Cross-Cut Test

PAD PRINT SYMBOLS, WHITE, 0.15 MM MIN LINE WIDTH, IMAGE 22 × 18 MM MAX, LOCATION ±0.30 MM; ASTM D3359 CLASS 4B MIN

Laser mark vs Pad print — frequently asked

What is the difference between Laser mark and Pad print?

Laser Marking and Pad Printing are both marking & decoration finishes; pad print is the lower-cost option ($). Pad print is the thinner coating (5–10 µm), so it disturbs tight fits less.

When should I use Laser mark instead of Pad print?

Choose Laser mark when for variable permanent data. Conversely: choose Pad print when for coloured graphics on curved plastic.

Is Laser mark or Pad print cheaper?

Pad print is the lower-cost finish ($ against $ for Laser mark) among the finishes FabDigit quotes. Both are priced per part with a lot minimum; the exact figure appears on the instant quote once the part is uploaded.