FabDigitFabDigit

Titanium Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo vs Ti Grade 29

Titanium · grade comparison

Titanium Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo and Ti Grade 29 are both titanium grades. Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,100 MPa (160 ksi) against 830 MPa (120 ksi) for Ti Grade 29, about 33% more; tensile strength follows at 1,170 MPa (170 ksi) vs 900 MPa (131 ksi). In exchange, Ti Grade 29 is the more ductile: elongation 15% versus 10% for Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo, and Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo is harder (350 HB vs 330 HB). Ti Grade 29 is lighter (4.43 g/cm³ vs 4.65 g/cm³ for Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo) and Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo runs hotter in service (400°C vs 315°C continuous). On the shop floor, Ti Grade 29 welds better (very good vs poor).

Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6MoChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Ti Grade 29Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo vs Ti Grade 29: properties

Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6MoTi Grade 29

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

43 GPa6.2 Msi
44 GPa6.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

112 GPa16.2 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.33
0.34

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,170 MPa170 ksi
900 MPa131 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

1,100 MPa160 ksi
830 MPa120 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
15%

Reduction in Area

22%
38%

Compressive Strength

1,180 MPa171 ksi
870 MPa126 ksi

Shear Strength

720 MPa104 ksi
570 MPa82.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

560 MPa81.2 ksi
520 MPa75.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

32 MPa·√m29.1 ksi·√in
85 MPa·√m77.4 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

12 J8.9 ft·lbf
27 J19.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

350 HB
330 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

38 HRC
33 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

370 HV
340 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 114 GPa16.5 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

4.65 g/cm³0.17 lb/in³
4.43 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,590°C2,894 °F
1,604°C2,919 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,650°C3,002 °F
1,660°C3,020 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

6.6 W/m·K3.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
6.7 W/m·K3.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
526 J/kg·K0.13 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

8 µm/m·K4.4 µin/in·°F
8.7 µm/m·K4.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

365 J/g157 BTU/lb
290 J/g125 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
315°C599 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-253°C-423 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1.8×10⁻⁶ Ω·m70.9 µΩ·in
1.71×10⁻⁶ Ω·m67.3 µΩ·in

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 1 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

88 / 100
96 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

14 / 100
20 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

12%
20%

Weldability

30 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

35 / 100
40 / 100

Castability

—
45 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

700 MJ/kg300,946 BTU/lb
650 MJ/kg279,450 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

42 kg CO₂/kg
45 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,000 L/kg120 gal/lb
800 L/kg95.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

252 kN·m/kg
203 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.5 MN·m/kg
25.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

5,307 kJ/m³
3,021 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3 mm²/s
2.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

8
6

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every titanium grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0004.555.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleTi-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6MoTi Grade 29

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityTi-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6MoTi Grade 29
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 1 finish: Plasma Spray.

Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo vs Ti Grade 29 — frequently asked

Is Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo stronger than Ti Grade 29?

Yes. Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo has a typical yield strength of 1,100 MPa (160 ksi) against 830 MPa (120 ksi) for Ti Grade 29 — about 33% more. Tensile strength is 1,170 MPa (170 ksi) vs 900 MPa (131 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo or Ti Grade 29?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo or Ti Grade 29?

Ti Grade 29. Its machinability rates poor (20/100) against not recommended (14/100) for Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo; for welding the order is Ti Grade 29 first (very good, 80/100) then Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo and Ti Grade 29 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.