FabDigitFabDigit

Titanium Grade 9 vs VT3-1

Titanium · grade comparison

Titanium Grade 9 and VT3-1 are both titanium grades. VT3-1 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 950 MPa (138 ksi) against 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) for Grade 9, about 67% more; tensile strength follows at 1,050 MPa (152 ksi) vs 690 MPa (100 ksi). In exchange, Grade 9 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 13% for VT3-1, and VT3-1 is harder (320 HB vs 250 HB). VT3-1 is stiffer (115 GPa vs 100 GPa) and VT3-1 runs hotter in service (450°C vs 300°C continuous). On the shop floor, Grade 9 machines more easily (28 vs 16 out of 100) and Grade 9 welds better (very good vs fair).

Grade 9Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

VT3-1Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Grade 9 vs VT3-1: properties

Grade 9VT3-1

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

100 GPa14.5 Msi
115 GPa16.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

107 GPa15.5 Msi
105 GPa15.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

690 MPa100 ksi
1,050 MPa152 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

570 MPa82.7 ksi
950 MPa138 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
13%

Reduction in Area

38%
35%

Compressive Strength

600 MPa87 ksi
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Shear Strength

450 MPa65.3 ksi
640 MPa92.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

450 MPa65.3 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in
45 MPa·√m41 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

250 HB
320 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

24 HRC
34 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

260 HV
335 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 44 GPa6.4 Msi · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 25 J18.4 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

4.48 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³
4.5 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,650°C3,002 °F
1,600°C2,912 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,704°C3,099 °F
1,650°C3,002 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

7.6 W/m·K4.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
8 W/m·K4.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

544 J/kg·K0.13 BTU/lb·°F
540 J/kg·K0.13 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

9.2 µm/m·K5.1 µin/in·°F
8.6 µm/m·K4.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

365 J/g157 BTU/lb
360 J/g155 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
450°C842 °F

Min Service Temperature

-250°C-418 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.4 % IACS
1.1 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.26×10⁻⁶ Ω·m49.6 µΩ·in
1.6×10⁻⁶ Ω·m63 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.05 V

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
85 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

28 / 100
16 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

25%
18%

Weldability

80 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 650 MJ/kg279,450 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 42 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

154 kN·m/kg
233 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

22.3 MN·m/kg
25.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,625 kJ/m³
3,924 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.1 mm²/s
3.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

6
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every titanium grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0004.555.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleGrade 9VT3-1

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityGrade 9VT3-1
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionO—
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall1 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
TiAlNYes—
TiB2Yes—
TiCNYes—
TiNYes—
WC/CYes—

They share 1 finish: Plasma Spray.

Grade 9 vs VT3-1 — frequently asked

Is VT3-1 stronger than Grade 9?

Yes. VT3-1 has a typical yield strength of 950 MPa (138 ksi) against 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) for Grade 9 — about 67% more. Tensile strength is 1,050 MPa (152 ksi) vs 690 MPa (100 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Grade 9 or VT3-1?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Grade 9 or VT3-1?

Grade 9, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 28/100 against 16/100 for VT3-1; for welding the order is Grade 9 first (very good, 80/100) then VT3-1 (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Grade 9 and VT3-1 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.