FabDigitFabDigit

Titanium Grade 27 vs Ti-8Al-1Mo-1V

Titanium · grade comparison

Titanium Grade 27 and Ti-8Al-1Mo-1V are both titanium grades. Ti-8Al-1Mo-1V is the stronger of the two: yield strength 950 MPa (138 ksi) against 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) for Grade 27, about 4.1 times as much; tensile strength follows at 1,000 MPa (145 ksi) vs 330 MPa (47.9 ksi). In exchange, Grade 27 is the more ductile: elongation 32% versus 15% for Ti-8Al-1Mo-1V, and Ti-8Al-1Mo-1V is harder (315 HB vs 120 HB). Ti-8Al-1Mo-1V is lighter (4.37 g/cm³ vs 4.51 g/cm³ for Grade 27) and Ti-8Al-1Mo-1V is stiffer (124 GPa vs 103 GPa). On the shop floor, Grade 27 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and Grade 27 welds better (excellent vs good).

Grade 27Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

Ti-8Al-1Mo-1VChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Grade 27 vs Ti-8Al-1Mo-1V: properties

Grade 27Ti-8Al-1Mo-1V

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

103 GPa14.9 Msi
124 GPa18 Msi

Shear Modulus

45 GPa6.5 Msi
46 GPa6.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

110 GPa16 Msi
115 GPa16.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

330 MPa47.9 ksi
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

230 MPa33.4 ksi
950 MPa138 ksi

Elongation at Break

32%
15%

Reduction in Area

55%
30%

Compressive Strength

250 MPa36.3 ksi
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Shear Strength

240 MPa34.8 ksi
660 MPa95.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

190 MPa27.6 ksi
540 MPa78.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

85 MPa·√m77.4 ksi·√in
70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

90 J66.4 ft·lbf
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

120 HB
315 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

70 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

125 HV
330 HV

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
33 HRC

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

4.51 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³
4.37 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,665°C3,029 °F
1,540°C2,804 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,670°C3,038 °F
1,650°C3,002 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

16.4 W/m·K9.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
6.5 W/m·K3.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

523 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F
500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

8.6 µm/m·K4.8 µin/in·°F
8.5 µm/m·K4.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

315°C599 °F
450°C842 °F

Min Service Temperature

-250°C-418 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 365 J/g157 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.1 % IACS
0.9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m22 µΩ·in
1.99×10⁻⁶ Ω·m78.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

96 / 100
85 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
18 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

38%
20%

Weldability

92 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

88 / 100
30 / 100

Castability

30 / 100
—

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 45 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

680 MJ/kg292,348 BTU/lb
700 MJ/kg300,946 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

42 kg CO₂/kg
45 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

550 L/kg65.9 gal/lb
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

73 kN·m/kg
229 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

22.8 MN·m/kg
28.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

257 kJ/m³
3,639 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

7 mm²/s
3 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 6

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every titanium grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0004.555.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleGrade 27Ti-8Al-1Mo-1V

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityGrade 27Ti-8Al-1Mo-1V
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 1 finish: Plasma Spray.

Grade 27 vs Ti-8Al-1Mo-1V — frequently asked

Is Ti-8Al-1Mo-1V stronger than Grade 27?

Yes. Ti-8Al-1Mo-1V has a typical yield strength of 950 MPa (138 ksi) against 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) for Grade 27 — about 4.1 times as much. Tensile strength is 1,000 MPa (145 ksi) vs 330 MPa (47.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Grade 27 or Ti-8Al-1Mo-1V?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Grade 27 or Ti-8Al-1Mo-1V?

Grade 27. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against poor (18/100) for Ti-8Al-1Mo-1V; for welding the order is Grade 27 first (excellent, 92/100) then Ti-8Al-1Mo-1V (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Grade 27 and Ti-8Al-1Mo-1V side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.