FabDigitFabDigit

Titanium C-23 vs C-4

Titanium · grade comparison

Titanium C-23 and C-4 are both titanium grades. C-23 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 860 MPa (125 ksi) against 530 MPa (76.9 ksi) for C-4, about 62% more; tensile strength follows at 930 MPa (135 ksi) vs 620 MPa (89.9 ksi). C-23 is harder — 330 HB against 265 HB for C-4 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. C-23 is stiffer (112 GPa vs 104 GPa) and C-23 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 300°C continuous). On the shop floor, C-4 machines more easily (30 vs 20 out of 100) and C-4 welds better (excellent vs very good).

C-23Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

C-4Choose it when the part is machined in volume, or when it will be welded.

C-23 vs C-4: properties

C-23C-4

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

112 GPa16.2 Msi
104 GPa15.1 Msi

Shear Modulus

42 GPa6.1 Msi
45 GPa6.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

108 GPa15.7 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

930 MPa135 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

860 MPa125 ksi
530 MPa76.9 ksi

Reduction in Area

22%
20%

Compressive Strength

950 MPa138 ksi
560 MPa81.2 ksi

Shear Strength

580 MPa84.1 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

500 MPa72.5 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

85 MPa·√m77.4 ksi·√in
60 MPa·√m54.6 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

24 J17.7 ft·lbf
14 J10.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

330 HB
265 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

34 HRC
26 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

345 HV
280 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Elongation at Break 12%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

4.43 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³
4.51 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,604°C2,919 °F
1,660°C3,020 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,660°C3,020 °F
1,670°C3,038 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

6.7 W/m·K3.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
17.2 W/m·K9.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

560 J/kg·K0.13 BTU/lb·°F
544 J/kg·K0.13 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

8.8 µm/m·K4.9 µin/in·°F
8.6 µm/m·K4.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

365 J/g157 BTU/lb
320 J/g138 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
300°C572 °F

Min Service Temperature

-253°C-423 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1 % IACS
2.9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.71×10⁻⁶ Ω·m67.3 µΩ·in
6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m23.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.12 V
-0.1 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 92 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

20 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

22%
35%

Weldability

75 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
75 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 20 / 100 · Castability 60 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

700 MJ/kg300,946 BTU/lb
650 MJ/kg279,450 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

45 kg CO₂/kg
39 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

950 L/kg114 gal/lb
900 L/kg108 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

210 kN·m/kg
137 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.3 MN·m/kg
23.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

3,302 kJ/m³
1,350 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

2.7 mm²/s
7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

6
12

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every titanium grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0004.555.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC-4C-23

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC-23C-4
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 1 finish: Plasma Spray.

C-23 vs C-4 — frequently asked

Is C-23 stronger than C-4?

Yes. C-23 has a typical yield strength of 860 MPa (125 ksi) against 530 MPa (76.9 ksi) for C-4 — about 62% more. Tensile strength is 930 MPa (135 ksi) vs 620 MPa (89.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C-23 or C-4?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C-23 or C-4?

C-4, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 20/100 for C-23; for welding the order is C-4 first (excellent, 85/100) then C-23 (very good, 75/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C-23 and C-4 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.