FabDigitFabDigit

Titanium C-12 vs ZTA15

Titanium · grade comparison

Titanium C-12 and ZTA15 are both titanium grades. ZTA15 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 850 MPa (123 ksi) against 455 MPa (66 ksi) for C-12, about 87% more; tensile strength follows at 940 MPa (136 ksi) vs 560 MPa (81.2 ksi). In exchange, C-12 is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 9% for ZTA15, and ZTA15 is harder (310 HB vs 210 HB). ZTA15 is stiffer (113 GPa vs 103 GPa) and ZTA15 runs hotter in service (500°C vs 315°C continuous). On the shop floor, C-12 machines more easily (28 vs 18 out of 100) and C-12 welds better (excellent vs very good).

C-12Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

ZTA15Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

C-12 vs ZTA15: properties

C-12ZTA15

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

103 GPa14.9 Msi
113 GPa16.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

45 GPa6.5 Msi
43 GPa6.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

560 MPa81.2 ksi
940 MPa136 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

455 MPa66 ksi
850 MPa123 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
9%

Compressive Strength

480 MPa69.6 ksi
900 MPa131 ksi

Shear Strength

380 MPa55.1 ksi
580 MPa84.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

280 MPa40.6 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

65 MPa·√m59.2 ksi·√in
78 MPa·√m71 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

25 J18.4 ft·lbf
28 J20.7 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

210 HB
310 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

95 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

220 HV
322 HV

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
32 HRC

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 110 GPa16 Msi · Reduction in Area 20%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

4.51 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³
4.46 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,650°C3,002 °F
1,630°C2,966 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,700°C3,092 °F
1,690°C3,074 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

19 W/m·K11 BTU/hr·ft·°F
7.5 W/m·K4.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

9.5 µm/m·K5.3 µin/in·°F
8.8 µm/m·K4.9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

395 J/g170 BTU/lb
365 J/g157 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

315°C599 °F
500°C932 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-253°C-423 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 540 J/kg·K0.13 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.3 % IACS
1.1 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m20.5 µΩ·in
1.6×10⁻⁶ Ω·m63 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.08 V

Corrosion Resistance

93 / 100
90 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

28 / 100
18 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

22%
20%

Weldability

85 / 100
75 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
15 / 100

Castability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 700 MJ/kg300,946 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 42 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

124 kN·m/kg
211 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

22.8 MN·m/kg
25.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,005 kJ/m³
3,197 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

7.8 mm²/s
3.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

11
7

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every titanium grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0004.555.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC-12ZTA15

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC-12ZTA15
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 1 finish: Plasma Spray.

C-12 vs ZTA15 — frequently asked

Is ZTA15 stronger than C-12?

Yes. ZTA15 has a typical yield strength of 850 MPa (123 ksi) against 455 MPa (66 ksi) for C-12 — about 87% more. Tensile strength is 940 MPa (136 ksi) vs 560 MPa (81.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C-12 or ZTA15?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C-12 or ZTA15?

C-12, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 28/100 against 18/100 for ZTA15; for welding the order is C-12 first (excellent, 85/100) then ZTA15 (very good, 75/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C-12 and ZTA15 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.