FabDigitFabDigit

Titanium C-1 vs ZTA15

Titanium · grade comparison

Titanium C-1 and ZTA15 are both titanium grades. ZTA15 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 850 MPa (123 ksi) against 210 MPa (30.5 ksi) for C-1, about 4.0 times as much; tensile strength follows at 940 MPa (136 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi). In exchange, C-1 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 9% for ZTA15, and ZTA15 is harder (310 HB vs 120 HB). ZTA15 is stiffer (113 GPa vs 103 GPa) and ZTA15 runs hotter in service (500°C vs 300°C continuous). On the shop floor, C-1 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and C-1 welds better (excellent vs very good).

C-1Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

ZTA15Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

C-1 vs ZTA15: properties

C-1ZTA15

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

103 GPa14.9 Msi
113 GPa16.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

45 GPa6.5 Msi
43 GPa6.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

108 GPa15.7 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
940 MPa136 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

210 MPa30.5 ksi
850 MPa123 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
9%

Reduction in Area

30%
20%

Compressive Strength

220 MPa31.9 ksi
900 MPa131 ksi

Shear Strength

210 MPa30.5 ksi
580 MPa84.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

145 MPa21 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

75 MPa·√m68.3 ksi·√in
78 MPa·√m71 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

45 J33.2 ft·lbf
28 J20.7 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

120 HB
310 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

65 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

130 HV
322 HV

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
32 HRC

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

4.51 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³
4.46 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,660°C3,020 °F
1,630°C2,966 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,670°C3,038 °F
1,690°C3,074 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

17 W/m·K9.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
7.5 W/m·K4.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

523 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F
540 J/kg·K0.13 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

8.6 µm/m·K4.8 µin/in·°F
8.8 µm/m·K4.9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

325 J/g140 BTU/lb
365 J/g157 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
500°C932 °F

Min Service Temperature

-250°C-418 °F
-253°C-423 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.6 % IACS
1.1 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m18.9 µΩ·in
1.6×10⁻⁶ Ω·m63 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.08 V

Corrosion Resistance

93 / 100
90 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

42 / 100
18 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

35%
20%

Weldability

88 / 100
75 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
15 / 100

Castability

65 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

640 MJ/kg275,151 BTU/lb
700 MJ/kg300,946 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

40 kg CO₂/kg
42 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

700 L/kg83.9 gal/lb
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

67 kN·m/kg
211 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

22.8 MN·m/kg
25.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

214 kJ/m³
3,197 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

7.2 mm²/s
3.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

6
7

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every titanium grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0004.555.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC-1ZTA15

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC-1ZTA15
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 1 finish: Plasma Spray.

C-1 vs ZTA15 — frequently asked

Is ZTA15 stronger than C-1?

Yes. ZTA15 has a typical yield strength of 850 MPa (123 ksi) against 210 MPa (30.5 ksi) for C-1 — about 4.0 times as much. Tensile strength is 940 MPa (136 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C-1 or ZTA15?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C-1 or ZTA15?

C-1. Its machinability rates fair (42/100) against poor (18/100) for ZTA15; for welding the order is C-1 first (excellent, 88/100) then ZTA15 (very good, 75/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C-1 and ZTA15 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.