FabDigitFabDigit

Titanium C-1 vs R56406

Titanium · grade comparison

Titanium C-1 and R56406 are both titanium grades. R56406 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 840 MPa (122 ksi) against 210 MPa (30.5 ksi) for C-1, about 4.0 times as much; tensile strength follows at 910 MPa (132 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi). In exchange, C-1 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 11% for R56406, and R56406 is harder (325 HB vs 120 HB). R56406 is stiffer (110 GPa vs 103 GPa) and R56406 runs hotter in service (350°C vs 300°C continuous). On the shop floor, C-1 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and C-1 welds better (excellent vs very good).

C-1Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

R56406Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

C-1 vs R56406: properties

C-1R56406

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

103 GPa14.9 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Shear Modulus

45 GPa6.5 Msi
42 GPa6.1 Msi

Bulk Modulus

108 GPa15.7 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
910 MPa132 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

210 MPa30.5 ksi
840 MPa122 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
11%

Reduction in Area

30%
21%

Compressive Strength

220 MPa31.9 ksi
900 MPa131 ksi

Shear Strength

210 MPa30.5 ksi
570 MPa82.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

145 MPa21 ksi
470 MPa68.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

75 MPa·√m68.3 ksi·√in
92 MPa·√m83.7 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

45 J33.2 ft·lbf
23 J17 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

120 HB
325 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

65 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

130 HV
340 HV

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
34 HRC

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

4.51 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³
4.43 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,660°C3,020 °F
1,604°C2,919 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,670°C3,038 °F
1,660°C3,020 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

17 W/m·K9.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
6.9 W/m·K4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

523 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F
546 J/kg·K0.13 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

8.6 µm/m·K4.8 µin/in·°F
8.7 µm/m·K4.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

325 J/g140 BTU/lb
365 J/g157 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
350°C662 °F

Min Service Temperature

-250°C-418 °F
-253°C-423 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.6 % IACS
1 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m18.9 µΩ·in
1.7×10⁻⁶ Ω·m66.9 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

93 / 100
92 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

42 / 100
20 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

35%
22%

Weldability

88 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
80 / 100

Same in both: Castability 65 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

640 MJ/kg275,151 BTU/lb
700 MJ/kg300,946 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

40 kg CO₂/kg
45 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Water 700 L/kg83.9 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

67 kN·m/kg
205 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

22.8 MN·m/kg
24.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

214 kJ/m³
3,207 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

7.2 mm²/s
2.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

6
7

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every titanium grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0004.555.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC-1R56406

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC-1R56406
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 1 finish: Plasma Spray.

C-1 vs R56406 — frequently asked

Is R56406 stronger than C-1?

Yes. R56406 has a typical yield strength of 840 MPa (122 ksi) against 210 MPa (30.5 ksi) for C-1 — about 4.0 times as much. Tensile strength is 910 MPa (132 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C-1 or R56406?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C-1 or R56406?

C-1. Its machinability rates fair (42/100) against poor (20/100) for R56406; for welding the order is C-1 first (excellent, 88/100) then R56406 (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C-1 and R56406 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.