FabDigitFabDigit

Titanium B817 Type I vs Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924)

Titanium · grade comparison

Titanium B817 Type I and Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924) are both titanium grades. Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924) is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,040 MPa (151 ksi) against 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) for B817 Type I, about 197% more; tensile strength follows at 1,150 MPa (167 ksi) vs 450 MPa (65.3 ksi). In exchange, B817 Type I is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 11% for Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924), and Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924) is harder (340 HB vs 160 HB). Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924) is stiffer (113 GPa vs 100 GPa) and Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924) runs hotter in service (350°C vs 300°C continuous). On the shop floor, B817 Type I machines more easily (fair vs poor) and B817 Type I welds better (very good vs good).

B817 Type IChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924)Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

B817 Type I vs Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924): properties

B817 Type ITi-6Al-4V (AM, F2924)

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

100 GPa14.5 Msi
113 GPa16.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

38 GPa5.5 Msi
44 GPa6.4 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

450 MPa65.3 ksi
1,150 MPa167 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

350 MPa50.8 ksi
1,040 MPa151 ksi

Elongation at Break

18%
11%

Reduction in Area

30%
25%

Compressive Strength

450 MPa65.3 ksi
1,200 MPa174 ksi

Shear Strength

300 MPa43.5 ksi
720 MPa104 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

200 MPa29 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

55 MPa·√m50.1 ksi·√in
50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
13 J9.6 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

160 HB
340 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

82 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

170 HV
355 HV

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
36 HRC

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 110 GPa16 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

4.42 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³
4.43 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,660°C3,020 °F
1,604°C2,919 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,670°C3,038 °F
1,660°C3,020 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

16 W/m·K9.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
6.8 W/m·K3.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

523 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F
526 J/kg·K0.13 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

8.6 µm/m·K4.8 µin/in·°F
8.7 µm/m·K4.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

295 J/g127 BTU/lb
370 J/g159 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
350°C662 °F

Min Service Temperature

-250°C-418 °F
-253°C-423 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.1 % IACS
1 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m22 µΩ·in
1.71×10⁻⁶ Ω·m67.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

88 / 100
92 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
18 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
22%

Weldability

75 / 100
65 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
20 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

750 MJ/kg322,442 BTU/lb
720 MJ/kg309,545 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

48 kg CO₂/kg
46 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb
1,300 L/kg156 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

20%
10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

102 kN·m/kg
260 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

22.6 MN·m/kg
25.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

613 kJ/m³
4,786 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

6.9 mm²/s
2.9 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every titanium grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0004.555.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleB817 Type ITi-6Al-4V (AM, F2924)

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityB817 Type ITi-6Al-4V (AM, F2924)
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 1 finish: Plasma Spray.

B817 Type I vs Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924) — frequently asked

Is Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924) stronger than B817 Type I?

Yes. Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924) has a typical yield strength of 1,040 MPa (151 ksi) against 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) for B817 Type I — about 197% more. Tensile strength is 1,150 MPa (167 ksi) vs 450 MPa (65.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, B817 Type I or Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924)?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, B817 Type I or Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924)?

B817 Type I. Its machinability rates fair (35/100) against poor (18/100) for Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924); for welding the order is B817 Type I first (very good, 75/100) then Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924) (good, 65/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in B817 Type I and Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924) side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.