FabDigitFabDigit

Steel WC4 vs ZG55SiMnMo

Steel · grade comparison

Steel WC4 and ZG55SiMnMo are both steel grades. ZG55SiMnMo is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,300 MPa (189 ksi) against 335 MPa (48.6 ksi) for WC4, about 3.9 times as much; tensile strength follows at 1,600 MPa (232 ksi) vs 545 MPa (79 ksi). In exchange, WC4 is the more ductile: elongation 24% versus 5% for ZG55SiMnMo, and ZG55SiMnMo is harder (460 HB vs 163 HB). WC4 runs hotter in service (540°C vs 350°C continuous) and WC4 conducts electricity better (7.8 % IACS vs 6.2 % IACS). On the shop floor, WC4 machines more easily (good vs poor) and WC4 welds better (good vs poor).

WC4Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

ZG55SiMnMoChoose it when strength drives the design.

WC4 vs ZG55SiMnMo: properties

WC4ZG55SiMnMo

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
205 GPa29.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

78 GPa11.3 Msi
80 GPa11.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

545 MPa79 ksi
1,600 MPa232 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

335 MPa48.6 ksi
1,300 MPa189 ksi

Elongation at Break

24%
5%

Reduction in Area

50%
15%

Compressive Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
1,700 MPa247 ksi

Shear Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
960 MPa139 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

235 MPa34.1 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

120 MPa·√m109 ksi·√in
45 MPa·√m41 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

48 J35.4 ft·lbf
18 J13.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

163 HB
460 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

85 HRB
—

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
47 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

—
480 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.83 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.8 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,500°C2,732 °F
1,480°C2,696 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
38 W/m·K22 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.3 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F
12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

540°C1,004 °F
350°C662 °F

Min Service Temperature

-29°C-20 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

7.8 % IACS
6.2 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in
2.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m11 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.62 V
-0.6 V

Corrosion Resistance

14 / 100
12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

58 / 100
15 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

60%
15%

Weldability

55 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

20 / 100
5 / 100

Castability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

55 L/kg6.6 gal/lb
40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

75%
80%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 26 MJ/kg11,178 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

70 kN·m/kg
205 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
26.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

281 kJ/m³
4,122 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.4 mm²/s
10.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

9
25

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleWC4ZG55SiMnMo

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityWC4ZG55SiMnMo
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

WC4 vs ZG55SiMnMo — frequently asked

Is ZG55SiMnMo stronger than WC4?

Yes. ZG55SiMnMo has a typical yield strength of 1,300 MPa (189 ksi) against 335 MPa (48.6 ksi) for WC4 — about 3.9 times as much. Tensile strength is 1,600 MPa (232 ksi) vs 545 MPa (79 ksi).

Which is cheaper, WC4 or ZG55SiMnMo?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, WC4 or ZG55SiMnMo?

WC4. Its machinability rates good (58/100) against poor (15/100) for ZG55SiMnMo; for welding the order is WC4 first (good, 55/100) then ZG55SiMnMo (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in WC4 and ZG55SiMnMo side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.