FabDigitFabDigit

Steel M103-27N vs M19

Steel · grade comparison

Steel M103-27N and M19 are both steel grades. M19 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) against 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) for M103-27N, about 6% more; tensile strength follows at 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) vs 360 MPa (52.2 ksi). M19 is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 10% for M103-27N, and M103-27N is harder (180 HV vs 150 HV). M19 is stiffer (200 GPa vs 120 GPa) and M19 conducts heat better (25 W/m·K vs 22 W/m·K). On the shop floor, M19 machines more easily (45 vs 35 out of 100) and M19 welds better (fair vs poor).

M19Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

M103-27N vs M19: properties

M103-27NM19

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

120 GPa17.4 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Shear Modulus

60 GPa8.7 Msi
78 GPa11.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

165 GPa23.9 Msi
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

360 MPa52.2 ksi
460 MPa66.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

320 MPa46.4 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
25%

Shear Strength

250 MPa36.3 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

180 MPa26.1 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell B

88 HRB
72 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

180 HV
150 HV

Reduction in Area

—
45%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,490°C2,714 °F
1,480°C2,696 °F

Same in both: Density 7.65 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Liquidus Temperature 1,520°C2,768 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

22 W/m·K12.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
25 W/m·K14.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.6 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F
11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

250 J/g107 BTU/lb
260 J/g112 BTU/lb

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.6 % IACS
3.3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m18.9 µΩ·in
5.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m20.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

20 / 100
15 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.6 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
45 / 100

Weldability

30 / 100
50 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
65 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
50 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
50 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 45%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

33 MJ/kg14,187 BTU/lb
32 MJ/kg13,758 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.6 kg CO₂/kg
2.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

65 L/kg7.8 gal/lb
55 L/kg6.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

15%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

47 kN·m/kg
60 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

15.7 MN·m/kg
26.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

427 kJ/m³
289 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

6 mm²/s
6.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

6
5

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleM19M103-27N

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityM103-27NM19
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—Annealed
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Black Oxide—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes
Tin Plating—Yes
Zinc Plating—Yes
Zinc-Flake (Dip-Spin) Coating—Yes
Zinc-Nickel Plating—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

M103-27N vs M19 — frequently asked

Is M19 stronger than M103-27N?

Yes. M19 has a typical yield strength of 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) against 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) for M103-27N — about 6% more. Tensile strength is 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) vs 360 MPa (52.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, M103-27N or M19?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, M103-27N or M19?

M19, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 35/100 for M103-27N; for welding the order is M19 first (fair, 50/100) then M103-27N (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in M103-27N and M19 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.