FabDigitFabDigit

Steel L2 vs O1

Steel · grade comparison

Steel L2 and O1 are both steel grades. L2 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 510 MPa (74 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for O1, about 28% more. O1 is harder — 200 HB against 183 HB for L2 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. L2 conducts electricity better (7.8 % IACS vs 7 % IACS). On the shop floor, L2 machines more easily (good vs fair) and L2 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than O1 (high, $$$$).

L2Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

O1Choose it when surface hardness matters.

L2 vs O1: properties

L2O1

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

210 GPa30.5 Msi
205 GPa29.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
79 GPa11.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

710 MPa103 ksi
690 MPa100 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

510 MPa74 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Reduction in Area

50%
45%

Compressive Strength

520 MPa75.4 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Shear Strength

430 MPa62.4 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

350 MPa50.8 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

90 J66.4 ft·lbf
30 J22.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

183 HB
200 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

89 HRB
94 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

192 HV
210 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Elongation at Break 25%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.86 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,420°C2,588 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,490°C2,714 °F
1,460°C2,660 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

34 W/m·K19.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
35 W/m·K20.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.4 µm/m·K6.9 µin/in·°F
11.9 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F · Min Service Temperature -30°C-22 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

7.8 % IACS
7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in
2.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.84 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.6 V · Corrosion Resistance 12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

65%
42%

Weldability

25 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
35 / 100

Castability

30 / 100
—

Polishability

60 / 100
80 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

31 MJ/kg13,328 BTU/lb
32 MJ/kg13,758 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.3 kg CO₂/kg
2.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb
55 L/kg6.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

90 kN·m/kg
88 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.7 MN·m/kg
26.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

619 kJ/m³
390 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

9.4 mm²/s
9.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

9
10

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleO1L2

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityL2O1
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition—Annealed
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$$ High
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

L2 vs O1 — frequently asked

Is L2 stronger than O1?

Yes. L2 has a typical yield strength of 510 MPa (74 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for O1 — about 28% more. Tensile strength is 710 MPa (103 ksi) vs 690 MPa (100 ksi).

Which is cheaper, L2 or O1?

L2 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while O1 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, L2 or O1?

L2. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (45/100) for O1; for welding the order is L2 first (poor, 25/100) then O1 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in L2 and O1 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.