FabDigitFabDigit

Steel E6013 vs E7024

Steel · grade comparison

Steel E6013 and E7024 are both steel grades. E7024 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for E6013, about 8% more; tensile strength follows at 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) vs 490 MPa (71.1 ksi). On the shop floor, E6013 welds better (95 vs 85 out of 100).

E6013Choose it when it will be welded.

E7024Choose it when strength drives the design.

E6013 vs E7024: properties

E6013E7024

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

490 MPa71.1 ksi
520 MPa75.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

400 MPa58 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Compressive Strength

400 MPa58 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Shear Strength

300 MPa43.5 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

200 MPa29 ksi
210 MPa30.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in
60 MPa·√m54.6 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

65 J47.9 ft·lbf
55 J40.6 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

160 HB
165 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

84 HRB
85 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

168 HV
173 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 205 GPa29.7 Msi · Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Elongation at Break 25% · Reduction in Area 50%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,470°C2,678 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,520°C2,768 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

50 W/m·K28.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
48 W/m·K27.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-10°C14 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 350°C662 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 10 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 1.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.65 V
-0.61 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 10 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Weldability

95 / 100
85 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
50 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 60% · Brazeability / Solderability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

50 L/kg6 gal/lb
60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 32 MJ/kg13,758 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2.4 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

62 kN·m/kg
66 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

390 kJ/m³
451 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.6 mm²/s
13 mm²/s

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 26.1 MN·m/kg · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 10

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleE7024E6013

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityE6013E7024
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

E6013 vs E7024 — frequently asked

Is E7024 stronger than E6013?

Yes. E7024 has a typical yield strength of 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for E6013 — about 8% more. Tensile strength is 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) vs 490 MPa (71.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, E6013 or E7024?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, E6013 or E7024?

E6013, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 60/100 against 55/100 for E7024; for welding the order is E6013 first (excellent, 95/100) then E7024 (excellent, 85/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in E6013 and E7024 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.