FabDigitFabDigit

Steel C12 vs WC4

Steel · grade comparison

Steel C12 and WC4 are both steel grades. C12 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 335 MPa (48.6 ksi) for WC4, about 40% more; tensile strength follows at 660 MPa (95.7 ksi) vs 545 MPa (79 ksi). C12 is harder — 200 HB against 163 HB for WC4 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. C12 runs hotter in service (600°C vs 540°C continuous) and WC4 conducts heat better (42 W/m·K vs 26 W/m·K). On the shop floor, WC4 machines more easily (good vs fair), WC4 welds better (good vs fair), and WC4 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than C12 (premium, $$$).

C12Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

WC4Choose it when the part is machined in volume, or when it will be welded.

C12 vs WC4: properties

C12WC4

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

207 GPa30 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Shear Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
78 GPa11.3 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

660 MPa95.7 ksi
545 MPa79 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

470 MPa68.2 ksi
335 MPa48.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

22%
24%

Reduction in Area

55%
50%

Compressive Strength

470 MPa68.2 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Shear Strength

400 MPa58 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

290 MPa42.1 ksi
235 MPa34.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

100 MPa·√m91 ksi·√in
120 MPa·√m109 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

40 J29.5 ft·lbf
48 J35.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

200 HB
163 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

93 HRB
85 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

15 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

210 HV
—

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.79 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.83 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 1,425°C2,597 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,500°C2,732 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

26 W/m·K15 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.2 µm/m·K6.2 µin/in·°F
12.3 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

600°C1,112 °F
540°C1,004 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -29°C-20 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.9 % IACS
7.8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m23.6 µΩ·in
2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.55 V
-0.62 V

Corrosion Resistance

32 / 100
14 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
58 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
60%

Weldability

35 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

32 MJ/kg13,758 BTU/lb
26 MJ/kg11,178 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.5 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb
55 L/kg6.6 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 75%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

85 kN·m/kg
70 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.6 MN·m/kg
25.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

534 kJ/m³
281 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

7.3 mm²/s
11.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

7
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleWC4C12

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC12WC4
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

C12 vs WC4 — frequently asked

Is C12 stronger than WC4?

Yes. C12 has a typical yield strength of 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 335 MPa (48.6 ksi) for WC4 — about 40% more. Tensile strength is 660 MPa (95.7 ksi) vs 545 MPa (79 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C12 or WC4?

WC4 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while C12 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C12 or WC4?

WC4. Its machinability rates good (58/100) against fair (40/100) for C12; for welding the order is WC4 first (good, 55/100) then C12 (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C12 and WC4 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.