Steel ASP 2030 vs CPM 10V
Steel · grade comparison
Steel ASP 2030 and CPM 10V are both steel grades. ASP 2030 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 600 MPa (87 ksi) against 560 MPa (81.2 ksi) for CPM 10V, about 7% more; tensile strength follows at 950 MPa (138 ksi) vs 830 MPa (120 ksi). ASP 2030 is harder — 300 HB against 255 HB for CPM 10V — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. CPM 10V is lighter (7.41 g/cm³ vs 8 g/cm³ for ASP 2030) and CPM 10V runs hotter in service (480°C vs 300°C continuous). On the shop floor, CPM 10V sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than ASP 2030 (high, $$$$).
ASP 2030Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.
CPM 10VChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part sees heat.
ASP 2030 vs CPM 10V: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all steel grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all steel grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Shear Modulus
Bulk Modulus
Poisson's Ratio
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Reduction in Area
Compressive Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Fracture Toughness (K_IC)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Rockwell C
Hardness, Vickers
Shear Strength
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Rockwell B
Same in both: Elongation at Break 12%
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Min Service Temperature
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Resistivity
Electrical Conductivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Corrosion Resistance
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Brazeability / Solderability
Polishability
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Water
Typical Recycled Content
Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 5.5 kg CO₂/kg
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | ASP 2030 | CPM 10V |
|---|---|---|
| CNC machining | — | Yes |
| Default condition | — | Annealed |
| Relative cost | $$$$ High | $$$ Premium |
| Min. machined wall | — | 0.8 mm |
| Best machined surface | — | Ra 1.6 µm |
| AlCrN | — | Yes |
| AlTiN | — | Yes |
| Black Oxide | — | Yes |
| CVD Al2O3 | — | Yes |
| CVD TiCN | — | Yes |
| CVD TiN | — | Yes |
| Cerakote | — | Yes |
| Chrome Plating | — | Yes |
| CrN | — | Yes |
| DLC | — | Yes |
| E-Coating | — | Yes |
| HVOF Coating | — | Yes |
| Hot-Dip Galvanizing | — | Yes |
| MoS2 | — | Yes |
| Multilayer CVD | — | Yes |
| Nickel Plating | — | Yes |
| PTFE Coating | — | Yes |
| Painting | — | Yes |
They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.
ASP 2030 vs CPM 10V — frequently asked
Is ASP 2030 stronger than CPM 10V?
Yes. ASP 2030 has a typical yield strength of 600 MPa (87 ksi) against 560 MPa (81.2 ksi) for CPM 10V — about 7% more. Tensile strength is 950 MPa (138 ksi) vs 830 MPa (120 ksi).
Which is cheaper, ASP 2030 or CPM 10V?
CPM 10V is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while ASP 2030 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.
Which welds better, ASP 2030 or CPM 10V?
ASP 2030. Its weldability rates poor (20/100) against poor (15/100) for CPM 10V.
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ASP 2030 and CPM 10V side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.