FabDigitFabDigit

Steel AR500 vs Hardox 400

Steel · grade comparison

Steel AR500 and Hardox 400 are both steel grades, both wear resistant steel. AR500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,350 MPa (196 ksi) against 1,000 MPa (145 ksi) for Hardox 400, about 35% more; tensile strength follows at 1,650 MPa (239 ksi) vs 1,250 MPa (181 ksi). In exchange, Hardox 400 is the more ductile: elongation 10% versus 9% for AR500, and AR500 is harder (500 HB vs 400 HB). AR500 conducts heat better (40 W/m·K vs 34 W/m·K). On the shop floor, Hardox 400 machines more easily (poor vs not recommended), Hardox 400 welds better (good vs fair), and Hardox 400 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than AR500 (high, $$$$).

AR500Choose it when strength drives the design.

Hardox 400Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

AR500 vs Hardox 400: properties

AR500Hardox 400

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

205 GPa29.7 Msi
210 GPa30.5 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,650 MPa239 ksi
1,250 MPa181 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

1,350 MPa196 ksi
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Elongation at Break

9%
10%

Reduction in Area

30%
40%

Compressive Strength

1,400 MPa203 ksi
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Shear Strength

1,000 MPa145 ksi
750 MPa109 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

700 MPa102 ksi
560 MPa81.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in
70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

35 J25.8 ft·lbf
45 J33.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

500 HB
400 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

50 HRC
43 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

525 HV
420 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,420°C2,588 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,500°C2,732 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
34 W/m·K19.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 250°C482 °F · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

7.5 % IACS
7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.3×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.06 µΩ·in
2.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.84 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.62 V
—

Corrosion Resistance

13 / 100
12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

12 / 100
25 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

10%
20%

Weldability

45 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.3 kg CO₂/kg
2.1 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

55 L/kg6.6 gal/lb
40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 30 MJ/kg12,898 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

210 kN·m/kg
159 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.1 MN·m/kg
26.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

4,445 kJ/m³
2,381 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

10.8 mm²/s
9.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

27
17

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAR500Hardox 400

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAR500Hardox 400
Default conditionQ&TQ&T
Relative cost$$$$ High$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 38 finishes: AlCrN, AlTiN, Black Oxide, CVD Al2O3, CVD TiCN, CVD TiN, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, CrN, DLC, E-Coating and 26 more.

AR500 vs Hardox 400 — frequently asked

Is AR500 stronger than Hardox 400?

Yes. AR500 has a typical yield strength of 1,350 MPa (196 ksi) against 1,000 MPa (145 ksi) for Hardox 400 — about 35% more. Tensile strength is 1,650 MPa (239 ksi) vs 1,250 MPa (181 ksi).

Which is cheaper, AR500 or Hardox 400?

Hardox 400 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while AR500 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, AR500 or Hardox 400?

Hardox 400. Its machinability rates poor (25/100) against not recommended (12/100) for AR500; for welding the order is Hardox 400 first (good, 60/100) then AR500 (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AR500 and Hardox 400 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.