FabDigitFabDigit

Steel A204 vs AR500

Steel · grade comparison

Steel A204 and AR500 are both steel grades. AR500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,350 MPa (196 ksi) against 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) for A204, about 4.3 times as much; tensile strength follows at 1,650 MPa (239 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi). In exchange, A204 is the more ductile: elongation 24% versus 9% for AR500, and AR500 is harder (500 HB vs 160 HB). A204 runs hotter in service (480°C vs 250°C continuous). On the shop floor, A204 machines more easily (good vs not recommended), A204 welds better (very good vs fair), and A204 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than AR500 (high, $$$$).

A204Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

AR500Choose it when strength drives the design.

A204 vs AR500: properties

A204AR500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

520 MPa75.4 ksi
1,650 MPa239 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

315 MPa45.7 ksi
1,350 MPa196 ksi

Elongation at Break

24%
9%

Reduction in Area

48%
30%

Compressive Strength

315 MPa45.7 ksi
1,400 MPa203 ksi

Shear Strength

320 MPa46.4 ksi
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

230 MPa33.4 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

85 MPa·√m77.4 ksi·√in
50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

40 J29.5 ft·lbf
35 J25.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

160 HB
500 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

84 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

168 HV
525 HV

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
50 HRC

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 205 GPa29.7 Msi · Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,460°C2,660 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,510°C2,750 °F
1,500°C2,732 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

44 W/m·K25.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.3 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F
12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

250 J/g107 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

480°C896 °F
250°C482 °F

Min Service Temperature

-29°C-20 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

8.2 % IACS
7.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.1×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.27 µΩ·in
2.3×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.06 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.61 V
-0.62 V

Corrosion Resistance

12 / 100
13 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

58 / 100
12 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

60%
10%

Weldability

70 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
15 / 100

Castability

40 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
—

Polishability

50 / 100
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

26 MJ/kg11,178 BTU/lb
30 MJ/kg12,898 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2 kg CO₂/kg
2.3 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 55 L/kg6.6 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

66 kN·m/kg
210 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

242 kJ/m³
4,445 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

12.2 mm²/s
10.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

9
27

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 26.1 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAR500A204

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA204AR500
Default conditionHRQ&T
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 38 finishes: AlCrN, AlTiN, Black Oxide, CVD Al2O3, CVD TiCN, CVD TiN, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, CrN, DLC, E-Coating and 26 more.

A204 vs AR500 — frequently asked

Is AR500 stronger than A204?

Yes. AR500 has a typical yield strength of 1,350 MPa (196 ksi) against 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) for A204 — about 4.3 times as much. Tensile strength is 1,650 MPa (239 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, A204 or AR500?

A204 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while AR500 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, A204 or AR500?

A204. Its machinability rates good (58/100) against not recommended (12/100) for AR500; for welding the order is A204 first (very good, 70/100) then AR500 (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A204 and AR500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.