FabDigitFabDigit

Steel Alloy 79 vs Ingot Iron

Steel · grade comparison

Steel Alloy 79 and Ingot Iron are both steel grades. Alloy 79 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 270 MPa (39.2 ksi) against 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) for Ingot Iron, about 80% more; tensile strength follows at 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) vs 275 MPa (39.9 ksi). In exchange, Ingot Iron is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 40% for Alloy 79, and Alloy 79 is harder (120 HB vs 70 HB). Ingot Iron is lighter (7.87 g/cm³ vs 8.74 g/cm³ for Alloy 79) and Ingot Iron runs hotter in service (450°C vs 400°C continuous). On the shop floor, Ingot Iron machines more easily (fair vs poor), Ingot Iron welds better (excellent vs good), and Ingot Iron sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than Alloy 79 (high, $$$$).

Alloy 79Choose it when strength drives the design.

Ingot IronChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

Alloy 79 vs Ingot Iron: properties

Alloy 79Ingot Iron

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

78 GPa11.3 Msi
80 GPa11.6 Msi

Bulk Modulus

172 GPa24.9 Msi
170 GPa24.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

550 MPa79.8 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

270 MPa39.2 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

40%
45%

Reduction in Area

60%
70%

Shear Strength

370 MPa53.7 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

220 MPa31.9 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

160 J118 ft·lbf
200 J148 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

120 HB
70 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

65 HRB
28 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

125 HV
75 HV

Compressive Strength

—
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
130 MPa·√m118 ksi·√in

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 205 GPa29.7 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.74 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
7.87 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,535°C2,795 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,450°C2,642 °F
1,538°C2,800 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

30 W/m·K17.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
78 W/m·K45.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
455 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.7 µm/m·K7.1 µin/in·°F
12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

290 J/g125 BTU/lb
247 J/g106 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
450°C842 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3 % IACS
17.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m22.4 µΩ·in
1×10⁻⁷ Ω·m3.94 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.2 V
-0.62 V

Corrosion Resistance

50 / 100
10 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

32 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
50%

Weldability

60 / 100
95 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
95 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

75 / 100
60 / 100

Castability

—
35 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

115 MJ/kg49,441 BTU/lb
28 MJ/kg12,038 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

11 kg CO₂/kg
2.1 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
15%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

63 kN·m/kg
35 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

23.5 MN·m/kg
26 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

178 kJ/m³
55 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

7.5 mm²/s
21.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

6
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAlloy 79Ingot Iron

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAlloy 79Ingot Iron
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

Alloy 79 vs Ingot Iron — frequently asked

Is Alloy 79 stronger than Ingot Iron?

Yes. Alloy 79 has a typical yield strength of 270 MPa (39.2 ksi) against 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) for Ingot Iron — about 80% more. Tensile strength is 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) vs 275 MPa (39.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Alloy 79 or Ingot Iron?

Ingot Iron is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while Alloy 79 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Alloy 79 or Ingot Iron?

Ingot Iron. Its machinability rates fair (45/100) against poor (32/100) for Alloy 79; for welding the order is Ingot Iron first (excellent, 95/100) then Alloy 79 (good, 60/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Alloy 79 and Ingot Iron side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.