FabDigitFabDigit

Steel A242 vs X52

Steel · grade comparison

Steel A242 and X52 are both steel grades. X52 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) against 370 MPa (53.7 ksi) for A242, about 12% more. X52 is the more ductile: elongation 30% versus 24% for A242, and X52 is harder (165 HB vs 155 HB). X52 conducts electricity better (10 % IACS vs 8.5 % IACS). On the shop floor, X52 welds better (excellent vs very good).

X52Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

A242 vs X52: properties

A242X52

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
207 GPa30 Msi

Shear Modulus

79 GPa11.5 Msi
80 GPa11.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

510 MPa74 ksi
530 MPa76.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

370 MPa53.7 ksi
415 MPa60.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

24%
30%

Reduction in Area

50%
68%

Compressive Strength

370 MPa53.7 ksi
415 MPa60.2 ksi

Shear Strength

320 MPa46.4 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

120 MPa·√m109 ksi·√in
180 MPa·√m164 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

55 J40.6 ft·lbf
160 J118 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

155 HB
165 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

82 HRB
85 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

163 HV
175 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 245 MPa35.5 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,450°C2,642 °F
1,460°C2,660 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Liquidus Temperature 1,510°C2,750 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.7 µm/m·K6.5 µin/in·°F
12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

247 J/g106 BTU/lb
250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-45°C-49 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 48 W/m·K27.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 350°C662 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

8.5 % IACS
10 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.87 µΩ·in
1.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.6 V
-0.65 V

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

60%
62%

Weldability

80 / 100
92 / 100

Formability (cold)

65 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 58 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

1.9 kg CO₂/kg
2.1 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

30%
20%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

65 kN·m/kg
68 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
26.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

342 kJ/m³
416 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13 mm²/s
12.7 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 10

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA242X52

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA242X52
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

A242 vs X52 — frequently asked

Is X52 stronger than A242?

Yes. X52 has a typical yield strength of 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) against 370 MPa (53.7 ksi) for A242 — about 12% more. Tensile strength is 530 MPa (76.9 ksi) vs 510 MPa (74 ksi).

Which is cheaper, A242 or X52?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, A242 or X52?

X52. Its weldability rates excellent (92/100) against very good (80/100) for A242.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A242 and X52 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.