FabDigitFabDigit

Steel A242 vs Q355NH

Steel · grade comparison

Steel A242 and Q355NH are both steel grades. Q355NH is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 540 MPa (78.3 ksi) against 510 MPa (74 ksi) for A242, about 6% more. Q355NH is harder — 165 HB against 155 HB for A242 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. Q355NH runs hotter in service (400°C vs 350°C continuous).

Q355NHChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

A242 vs Q355NH: properties

A242Q355NH

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
206 GPa29.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

510 MPa74 ksi
540 MPa78.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

370 MPa53.7 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

24%
26%

Reduction in Area

50%
55%

Compressive Strength

370 MPa53.7 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Shear Strength

320 MPa46.4 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

245 MPa35.5 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

120 MPa·√m109 ksi·√in
110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

55 J40.6 ft·lbf
90 J66.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

155 HB
165 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

82 HRB
85 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

163 HV
172 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 79 GPa11.5 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,450°C2,642 °F
1,425°C2,597 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,510°C2,750 °F
1,505°C2,741 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

48 W/m·K27.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
44 W/m·K25.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.7 µm/m·K6.5 µin/in·°F
12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

247 J/g106 BTU/lb
250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

350°C662 °F
400°C752 °F

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

8.5 % IACS
8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.87 µΩ·in
2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
32 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.6 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

58 / 100
55 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
50 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 60% · Weldability 80 / 100 · Formability (cold) 65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

1.9 kg CO₂/kg
2.1 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb
45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

65 kN·m/kg
69 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
26.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

342 kJ/m³
350 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13 mm²/s
11.9 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 10

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA242Q355NH

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA242Q355NH
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

A242 vs Q355NH — frequently asked

Is Q355NH stronger than A242?

Yes. Q355NH has a typical tensile strength of 540 MPa (78.3 ksi) against 510 MPa (74 ksi) for A242 — about 6% more.

Which is cheaper, A242 or Q355NH?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose A242 over Q355NH?

Pick Q355NH when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A242 and Q355NH side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.