FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 30CrMoV9 vs AR500

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 30CrMoV9 and AR500 are both steel grades. AR500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,350 MPa (196 ksi) against 750 MPa (109 ksi) for 30CrMoV9, about 80% more; tensile strength follows at 1,650 MPa (239 ksi) vs 1,000 MPa (145 ksi). In exchange, 30CrMoV9 is the more ductile: elongation 11% versus 9% for AR500, and AR500 is harder (500 HB vs 305 HB). 30CrMoV9 runs hotter in service (450°C vs 250°C continuous) and AR500 conducts heat better (40 W/m·K vs 34 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 30CrMoV9 machines more easily (fair vs not recommended), AR500 welds better (fair vs poor), and 30CrMoV9 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than AR500 (high, $$$$).

30CrMoV9Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

AR500Choose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

30CrMoV9 vs AR500: properties

30CrMoV9AR500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

210 GPa30.5 Msi
205 GPa29.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

81 GPa11.7 Msi
80 GPa11.6 Msi

Bulk Modulus

165 GPa23.9 Msi
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,000 MPa145 ksi
1,650 MPa239 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

750 MPa109 ksi
1,350 MPa196 ksi

Elongation at Break

11%
9%

Reduction in Area

45%
30%

Compressive Strength

760 MPa110 ksi
1,400 MPa203 ksi

Shear Strength

620 MPa89.9 ksi
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

500 MPa72.5 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in
50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

40 J29.5 ft·lbf
35 J25.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

305 HB
500 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

31 HRC
50 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

320 HV
525 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,430°C2,606 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Liquidus Temperature 1,500°C2,732 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

34 W/m·K19.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F
12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

250 J/g107 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

450°C842 °F
250°C482 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

7.8 % IACS
7.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in
2.3×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.06 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.6 V
-0.62 V

Corrosion Resistance

18 / 100
13 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
12 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
10%

Weldability

22 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

20 / 100
15 / 100

Castability

20 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
—

Polishability

65 / 100
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

34 MJ/kg14,617 BTU/lb
30 MJ/kg12,898 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.4 kg CO₂/kg
2.3 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb
55 L/kg6.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

127 kN·m/kg
210 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.8 MN·m/kg
26.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,339 kJ/m³
4,445 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

9.4 mm²/s
10.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

14
27

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAR50030CrMoV9

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability30CrMoV9AR500
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—Q&T
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$$ High
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

30CrMoV9 vs AR500 — frequently asked

Is AR500 stronger than 30CrMoV9?

Yes. AR500 has a typical yield strength of 1,350 MPa (196 ksi) against 750 MPa (109 ksi) for 30CrMoV9 — about 80% more. Tensile strength is 1,650 MPa (239 ksi) vs 1,000 MPa (145 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 30CrMoV9 or AR500?

30CrMoV9 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while AR500 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 30CrMoV9 or AR500?

30CrMoV9. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against not recommended (12/100) for AR500; for welding the order is AR500 first (fair, 45/100) then 30CrMoV9 (poor, 22/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 30CrMoV9 and AR500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.