FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 27SiMn vs AR500

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 27SiMn and AR500 are both steel grades. AR500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,350 MPa (196 ksi) against 890 MPa (129 ksi) for 27SiMn, about 52% more; tensile strength follows at 1,650 MPa (239 ksi) vs 1,030 MPa (149 ksi). In exchange, 27SiMn is the more ductile: elongation 15% versus 9% for AR500, and AR500 is harder (500 HB vs 310 HB). 27SiMn runs hotter in service (350°C vs 250°C continuous) and AR500 conducts electricity better (7.5 % IACS vs 6.6 % IACS). On the shop floor, 27SiMn machines more easily (fair vs not recommended), AR500 welds better (45 vs 35 out of 100), and 27SiMn sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than AR500 (high, $$$$).

27SiMnChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

AR500Choose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

27SiMn vs AR500: properties

27SiMnAR500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

210 GPa30.5 Msi
205 GPa29.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

81 GPa11.7 Msi
80 GPa11.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,030 MPa149 ksi
1,650 MPa239 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

890 MPa129 ksi
1,350 MPa196 ksi

Elongation at Break

15%
9%

Reduction in Area

48%
30%

Shear Strength

640 MPa92.8 ksi
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

460 MPa66.7 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in
50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

50 J36.9 ft·lbf
35 J25.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

310 HB
500 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

32 HRC
50 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

325 HV
525 HV

Compressive Strength

—
1,400 MPa203 ksi

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Liquidus Temperature

1,490°C2,714 °F
1,500°C2,732 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,420°C2,588 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

38 W/m·K22 BTU/hr·ft·°F
40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.3 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F
12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

350°C662 °F
250°C482 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

6.6 % IACS
7.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m10.2 µΩ·in
2.3×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.06 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.61 V
-0.62 V

Corrosion Resistance

11 / 100
13 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
12 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
10%

Weldability

35 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
15 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
—

Polishability

65 / 100
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

26 MJ/kg11,178 BTU/lb
30 MJ/kg12,898 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2 kg CO₂/kg
2.3 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb
55 L/kg6.6 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

131 kN·m/kg
210 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.8 MN·m/kg
26.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,886 kJ/m³
4,445 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

10.3 mm²/s
10.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

15
27

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAR50027SiMn

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability27SiMnAR500
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—Q&T
Relative cost$ Budget$$$$ High
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

27SiMn vs AR500 — frequently asked

Is AR500 stronger than 27SiMn?

Yes. AR500 has a typical yield strength of 1,350 MPa (196 ksi) against 890 MPa (129 ksi) for 27SiMn — about 52% more. Tensile strength is 1,650 MPa (239 ksi) vs 1,030 MPa (149 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 27SiMn or AR500?

27SiMn is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while AR500 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 27SiMn or AR500?

27SiMn. Its machinability rates fair (45/100) against not recommended (12/100) for AR500; for welding the order is AR500 first (fair, 45/100) then 27SiMn (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 27SiMn and AR500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.