FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 1065 vs 18Ni(190)

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 1065 and 18Ni(190) are both steel grades. 18Ni(190) is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,280 MPa (186 ksi) against 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) for 1065, about 3.4 times as much; tensile strength follows at 1,330 MPa (193 ksi) vs 670 MPa (97.2 ksi). 18Ni(190) is the more ductile: elongation 14% versus 12% for 1065, and 18Ni(190) is harder (375 HB vs 190 HB). 1065 is stiffer (205 GPa vs 190 GPa) and 18Ni(190) runs hotter in service (400°C vs 350°C continuous). On the shop floor, 1065 machines more easily (45 vs 35 out of 100), 18Ni(190) welds better (excellent vs poor), and 1065 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than 18Ni(190) (high, $$$$).

1065Choose it when the part is machined in volume, or when cost is the deciding factor.

18Ni(190)Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

1065 vs 18Ni(190): properties

106518Ni(190)

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

205 GPa29.7 Msi
190 GPa27.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
72 GPa10.4 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

670 MPa97.2 ksi
1,330 MPa193 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

380 MPa55.1 ksi
1,280 MPa186 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
14%

Reduction in Area

30%
66%

Compressive Strength

380 MPa55.1 ksi
1,310 MPa190 ksi

Shear Strength

430 MPa62.4 ksi
800 MPa116 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

45 MPa·√m41 ksi·√in
155 MPa·√m141 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

10 J7.4 ft·lbf
70 J51.6 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

190 HB
375 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

92 HRB
—

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
40 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

—
395 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,413°C2,575 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,480°C2,696 °F
1,454°C2,649 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

49 W/m·K28.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
20.9 W/m·K12.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
452 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.3 µm/m·K6.3 µin/in·°F
10.1 µm/m·K5.6 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

247 J/g106 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

350°C662 °F
400°C752 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

9.5 % IACS
3.8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.09 µΩ·in
4.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m17.7 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.61 V
-0.6 V

Corrosion Resistance

10 / 100
25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
35 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

57%
32%

Weldability

25 / 100
85 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
50 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

1.9 kg CO₂/kg
4.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

30 L/kg3.6 gal/lb
120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

85 kN·m/kg
166 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.1 MN·m/kg
23.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

352 kJ/m³
4,312 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.3 mm²/s
5.8 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 14

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale106518Ni(190)

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability106518Ni(190)
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionHR—
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

1065 vs 18Ni(190) — frequently asked

Is 18Ni(190) stronger than 1065?

Yes. 18Ni(190) has a typical yield strength of 1,280 MPa (186 ksi) against 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) for 1065 — about 3.4 times as much. Tensile strength is 1,330 MPa (193 ksi) vs 670 MPa (97.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1065 or 18Ni(190)?

1065 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while 18Ni(190) is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 1065 or 18Ni(190)?

1065, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 35/100 for 18Ni(190); for welding the order is 18Ni(190) first (excellent, 85/100) then 1065 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1065 and 18Ni(190) side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.