FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 1065 vs 1095

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 1065 and 1095 are both steel grades, both high carbon steel. Both yield at about 380 MPa — strength does not separate them. 1095 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 350°C continuous). On the shop floor, 1065 welds better (25 vs 15 out of 100) and 1095 forms better (fair vs poor).

1065Choose it when it will be welded.

1095Choose it when the part sees heat.

1065 vs 1095: properties

10651095

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

670 MPa97.2 ksi
655 MPa95 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
13%

Reduction in Area

30%
40%

Compressive Strength

380 MPa55.1 ksi
390 MPa56.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

45 MPa·√m41 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

10 J7.4 ft·lbf
6 J4.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

190 HB
192 HB

Hardness, Vickers

—
200 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 205 GPa29.7 Msi · Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Yield Strength (0.2% offset) 380 MPa55.1 ksi · Shear Strength 430 MPa62.4 ksi · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 300 MPa43.5 ksi · Hardness, Rockwell B 92 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Liquidus Temperature

1,480°C2,696 °F
1,470°C2,678 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,425°C2,597 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

49 W/m·K28.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
46.7 W/m·K27 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.3 µm/m·K6.3 µin/in·°F
11.4 µm/m·K6.3 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

247 J/g106 BTU/lb
250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

350°C662 °F
400°C752 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

9.5 % IACS
9.6 % IACS

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.09 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

10 / 100
8 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.61 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

57%
45%

Weldability

25 / 100
15 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
40 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
75 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb
26 MJ/kg11,178 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

1.9 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

30 L/kg3.6 gal/lb
45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

85 kN·m/kg
83 kN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

13.3 mm²/s
12.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

14
13

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 26.1 MN·m/kg · Modulus of Resilience 352 kJ/m³

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale10651095

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability10651095
Default conditionHRAnnealed
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 38 finishes: AlCrN, AlTiN, Black Oxide, CVD Al2O3, CVD TiCN, CVD TiN, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, CrN, DLC, E-Coating and 26 more.

1065 vs 1095 — frequently asked

What is the difference between 1065 and 1095?

Steel 1065 and 1095 are both steel grades, both high carbon steel. Both yield at about 380 MPa — strength does not separate them. 1095 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 350°C continuous).

Which is cheaper, 1065 or 1095?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, 1065 or 1095?

1065. Its weldability rates poor (25/100) against poor (15/100) for 1095.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1065 and 1095 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.