FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 1035 vs C40

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 1035 and C40 are both steel grades. C40 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 375 MPa (54.4 ksi) against 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) for 1035, about 17% more. C40 is the more ductile: elongation 28% versus 18% for 1035. On the shop floor, 1035 welds better (good vs fair).

1035Choose it when it will be welded.

C40Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

1035 vs C40: properties

1035C40

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

585 MPa84.8 ksi
590 MPa85.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

320 MPa46.4 ksi
375 MPa54.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

18%
28%

Reduction in Area

40%
55%

Compressive Strength

320 MPa46.4 ksi
375 MPa54.4 ksi

Shear Strength

360 MPa52.2 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

260 MPa37.7 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

60 MPa·√m54.6 ksi·√in
55 MPa·√m50.1 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

163 HB
170 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

85 HRB
87 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

170 HV
178 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 205 GPa29.7 Msi · Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 55 J40.6 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,500°C2,732 °F
1,495°C2,723 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

49 W/m·K28.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
50 W/m·K28.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.9 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F
11.3 µm/m·K6.3 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

250 J/g107 BTU/lb
247 J/g106 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

425°C797 °F
400°C752 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 486 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

10.8 % IACS
10 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.3 µΩ·in
1.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.61 V
-0.62 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 10 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

65%
60%

Weldability

55 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

50 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

—
45 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2 kg CO₂/kg
1.9 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb
40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Modulus of Resilience

250 kJ/m³
343 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

12.8 mm²/s
13.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

12
13

Same in both: Specific Strength (UTS / density) 75 kN·m/kg · Specific Stiffness (E / density) 26.1 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1035C40

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1035C40
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionHR—
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

1035 vs C40 — frequently asked

Is C40 stronger than 1035?

Yes. C40 has a typical yield strength of 375 MPa (54.4 ksi) against 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) for 1035 — about 17% more. Tensile strength is 590 MPa (85.6 ksi) vs 585 MPa (84.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1035 or C40?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 1035 or C40?

1035, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 60/100 against 55/100 for C40; for welding the order is 1035 first (good, 55/100) then C40 (fair, 40/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1035 and C40 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.