FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 1035 vs C30

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 1035 and C30 are both steel grades. C30 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 345 MPa (50 ksi) against 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) for 1035, about 8% more. C30 is the more ductile: elongation 30% versus 18% for 1035, and 1035 is harder (163 HB vs 149 HB). On the shop floor, C30 welds better (65 vs 55 out of 100).

C30Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

1035 vs C30: properties

1035C30

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

585 MPa84.8 ksi
520 MPa75.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

320 MPa46.4 ksi
345 MPa50 ksi

Elongation at Break

18%
30%

Reduction in Area

40%
58%

Compressive Strength

320 MPa46.4 ksi
345 MPa50 ksi

Shear Strength

360 MPa52.2 ksi
315 MPa45.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

260 MPa37.7 ksi
245 MPa35.5 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

55 J40.6 ft·lbf
85 J62.7 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

163 HB
149 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

85 HRB
80 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

170 HV
157 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 205 GPa29.7 Msi · Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 60 MPa·√m54.6 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Liquidus Temperature

1,500°C2,732 °F
1,512°C2,754 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,425°C2,597 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

49 W/m·K28.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
50 W/m·K28.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

486 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F
470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.9 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F
12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

425°C797 °F
400°C752 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

10.8 % IACS
10 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.3 µΩ·in
1.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.61 V · Corrosion Resistance 10 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

65%
70%

Weldability

55 / 100
65 / 100

Formability (cold)

50 / 100
55 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

65 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb
40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

75 kN·m/kg
66 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

250 kJ/m³
290 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

12.8 mm²/s
13.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

12
11

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 26.1 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1035C30

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1035C30
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionHR—
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

1035 vs C30 — frequently asked

Is C30 stronger than 1035?

Yes. C30 has a typical yield strength of 345 MPa (50 ksi) against 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) for 1035 — about 8% more. Tensile strength is 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) vs 585 MPa (84.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1035 or C30?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, 1035 or C30?

C30. Its weldability rates good (65/100) against good (55/100) for 1035.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1035 and C30 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.