FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 1008 vs S15C

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 1008 and S15C are both steel grades. S15C is the stronger of the two: yield strength 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) against 175 MPa (25.4 ksi) for 1008, about 49% more; tensile strength follows at 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi). S15C is harder — 121 HB against 86 HB for 1008 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 1008 conducts heat better (60 W/m·K vs 51 W/m·K).

S15CChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

1008 vs S15C: properties

1008S15C

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
205 GPa29.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

175 MPa25.4 ksi
260 MPa37.7 ksi

Shear Strength

185 MPa26.8 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

150 MPa21.8 ksi
185 MPa26.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

86 HB
121 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

45 HRB
70 HRB

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
120 MPa·√m109 ksi·√in

Hardness, Vickers

—
127 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Elongation at Break 30% · Reduction in Area 55% · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 90 J66.4 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.87 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.86 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,495°C2,723 °F
1,490°C2,714 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,530°C2,786 °F
1,525°C2,777 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

60 W/m·K34.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
51 W/m·K29.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

481 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
486 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.2 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F
11.9 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

247 J/g106 BTU/lb
250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

425°C797 °F
400°C752 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -30°C-22 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

11.5 % IACS
11 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.91 µΩ·in
1.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.65 V
-0.61 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 10 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

48 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
60%

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
90 / 100

Polishability

50 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

—
40 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 95 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb
45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 1.9 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

38 kN·m/kg
53 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.4 MN·m/kg
26.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

77 kJ/m³
165 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

15.9 mm²/s
13.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

7
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1008S15C

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1008S15C
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionHR—
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Black OxideYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
E-CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—
Zinc PlatingYes—
Zinc-Flake (Dip-Spin) CoatingYes—
Zinc-Nickel PlatingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

1008 vs S15C — frequently asked

Is S15C stronger than 1008?

Yes. S15C has a typical yield strength of 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) against 175 MPa (25.4 ksi) for 1008 — about 49% more. Tensile strength is 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1008 or S15C?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 1008 or S15C?

S15C. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (48/100) for 1008.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1008 and S15C side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.