FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 1008 vs 1012

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 1008 and 1012 are both steel grades, both low carbon steel. 1012 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 185 MPa (26.8 ksi) against 175 MPa (25.4 ksi) for 1008, about 6% more; tensile strength follows at 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi). 1012 is harder — 95 HB against 86 HB for 1008 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 1008 conducts heat better (60 W/m·K vs 51.9 W/m·K).

1012Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

1008 vs 1012: properties

10081012

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
205 GPa29.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

175 MPa25.4 ksi
185 MPa26.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

30%
28%

Shear Strength

185 MPa26.8 ksi
220 MPa31.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

150 MPa21.8 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

90 J66.4 ft·lbf
70 J51.6 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

86 HB
95 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

45 HRB
55 HRB

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in

Same in both: Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Reduction in Area 55%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Liquidus Temperature

1,530°C2,786 °F
1,525°C2,777 °F

Same in both: Density 7.87 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,495°C2,723 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

60 W/m·K34.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
51.9 W/m·K30 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

481 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
486 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.2 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F
12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

247 J/g106 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

425°C797 °F
400°C752 °F

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

11.5 % IACS
10.8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.91 µΩ·in
1.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.65 V
-0.62 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 10 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

48 / 100
50 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
55%

Brazeability / Solderability

80 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

50 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 95 / 100 · Formability (cold) 85 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Typical Recycled Content

25%
30%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 1.9 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

38 kN·m/kg
42 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.4 MN·m/kg
26 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

77 kJ/m³
83 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

15.9 mm²/s
13.6 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 7

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale10081012

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability10081012
CNC machining—Yes
Default conditionHRHR
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
TiAlN—Yes
TiB2—Yes
TiCN—Yes
TiN—Yes
WC/C—Yes
ZrN—Yes

Both are offered for Sheet metal. They share 22 finishes: Black Oxide, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Hot-Dip Galvanizing, Manganese Phosphate, Nickel Plating and 10 more.

1008 vs 1012 — frequently asked

Is 1012 stronger than 1008?

Yes. 1012 has a typical yield strength of 185 MPa (26.8 ksi) against 175 MPa (25.4 ksi) for 1008 — about 6% more. Tensile strength is 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1008 or 1012?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose 1008 over 1012?

Pick 1012 when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1008 and 1012 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.