FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 1006 vs E195

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 1006 and E195 are both steel grades. E195 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for 1006, about 35% more; tensile strength follows at 370 MPa (53.7 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi). E195 is harder — 105 HB against 86 HB for 1006 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 1006 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 350°C continuous) and 1006 conducts heat better (65 W/m·K vs 52 W/m·K). On the shop floor, E195 machines more easily (good vs fair).

1006Choose it when the part sees heat.

E195Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

1006 vs E195: properties

1006E195

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

205 GPa29.7 Msi
210 GPa30.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
81 GPa11.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
370 MPa53.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

170 MPa24.7 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

30%
32%

Reduction in Area

55%
60%

Shear Strength

200 MPa29 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

150 MPa21.8 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

120 J88.5 ft·lbf
85 J62.7 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

86 HB
105 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

41 HRB
60 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

90 HV
110 HV

Compressive Strength

—
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 130 MPa·√m118 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.87 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,515°C2,759 °F
1,495°C2,723 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,535°C2,795 °F
1,525°C2,777 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

65 W/m·K37.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
52 W/m·K30 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

481 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

247 J/g106 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
350°C662 °F

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

12 % IACS
11.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.43×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.63 µΩ·in
1.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.91 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.65 V
-0.61 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 10 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
62 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
58%

Weldability

97 / 100
95 / 100

Formability (cold)

95 / 100
88 / 100

Castability

35 / 100
40 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.1 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

55 L/kg6.6 gal/lb
50 L/kg6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

28%
30%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

38 kN·m/kg
47 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26 MN·m/kg
26.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

70 kJ/m³
126 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

17.2 mm²/s
14.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1006E195

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1006E195
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionHR—
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Black OxideYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
E-CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—
Zinc PlatingYes—
Zinc-Flake (Dip-Spin) CoatingYes—
Zinc-Nickel PlatingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

1006 vs E195 — frequently asked

Is E195 stronger than 1006?

Yes. E195 has a typical yield strength of 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for 1006 — about 35% more. Tensile strength is 370 MPa (53.7 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1006 or E195?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 1006 or E195?

E195. Its machinability rates good (62/100) against fair (45/100) for 1006.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1006 and E195 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.