FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 1005 vs 1008

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 1005 and 1008 are both steel grades. 1005 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) against 175 MPa (25.4 ksi) for 1008, about 80% more; tensile strength follows at 365 MPa (52.9 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi). In exchange, 1008 is the more ductile: elongation 30% versus 20% for 1005, and 1005 is harder (105 HB vs 86 HB). 1008 conducts heat better (60 W/m·K vs 51.9 W/m·K).

1005Choose it when strength drives the design.

1008Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

1005 vs 1008: properties

10051008

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

365 MPa52.9 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

315 MPa45.7 ksi
175 MPa25.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
30%

Compressive Strength

315 MPa45.7 ksi
—

Shear Strength

220 MPa31.9 ksi
185 MPa26.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

175 MPa25.4 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

130 MPa·√m118 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

100 J73.8 ft·lbf
90 J66.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

105 HB
86 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

60 HRB
45 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

110 HV
—

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 200 GPa29 Msi · Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Reduction in Area 55%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 7.87 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,495°C2,723 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,530°C2,786 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

51.9 W/m·K30 BTU/hr·ft·°F
60 W/m·K34.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.9 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F
12.2 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
425°C797 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 481 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 247 J/g106 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

11 % IACS
11.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.59×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.26 µΩ·in
1.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.91 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.62 V
-0.65 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 10 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
48 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
45%

Formability (cold)

80 / 100
85 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

75 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
50 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 95 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2 kg CO₂/kg
1.9 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb
40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

46 kN·m/kg
38 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

248 kJ/m³
77 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.7 mm²/s
15.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

8
7

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 25.4 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale10081005

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability10051008
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—HR
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Black Oxide—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes
Tin Plating—Yes
Zinc Plating—Yes
Zinc-Flake (Dip-Spin) Coating—Yes
Zinc-Nickel Plating—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

1005 vs 1008 — frequently asked

Is 1005 stronger than 1008?

Yes. 1005 has a typical yield strength of 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) against 175 MPa (25.4 ksi) for 1008 — about 80% more. Tensile strength is 365 MPa (52.9 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1005 or 1008?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose 1005 over 1008?

Pick 1005 when strength drives the design. Pick 1008 when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1005 and 1008 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.