FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel ER308H vs ER317

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel ER308H and ER317 are both stainless steel grades. Both yield at about 415 MPa — strength does not separate them. ER308H conducts heat better (16.2 W/m·K vs 14.5 W/m·K). On the shop floor, ER308H sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than ER317 (high, $$$$).

ER308HChoose it when cost is the deciding factor.

ER308H vs ER317: properties

ER308HER317

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

196 GPa28.4 Msi
195 GPa28.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

160 GPa23.2 Msi
166 GPa24.1 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

590 MPa85.6 ksi
600 MPa87 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

415 MPa60.2 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Compressive Strength

420 MPa60.9 ksi
410 MPa59.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

230 MPa33.4 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

180 MPa·√m164 ksi·√in
150 MPa·√m137 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

85 J62.7 ft·lbf
80 J59 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

175 HB
180 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

87 HRB
88 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

185 HV
190 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Elongation at Break 38% · Reduction in Area 55% · Shear Strength 400 MPa58 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
7.98 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,400°C2,552 °F
1,370°C2,498 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,450°C2,642 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

16.2 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
14.5 W/m·K8.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

285 J/g123 BTU/lb
275 J/g118 BTU/lb

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 16.5 µm/m·K9.2 µin/in·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 800°C1,472 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.4 % IACS
2.2 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in
7.9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m31.1 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
72 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.05 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

38 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
32%

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
60 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 88 / 100 · Polishability 65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
58 MJ/kg24,936 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.5 kg CO₂/kg
4.6 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

60%
55%

Same in both: Embodied Water 130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.8 MN·m/kg
24.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

439 kJ/m³
410 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

4.1 mm²/s
3.6 mm²/s

Same in both: Specific Strength (UTS / density) 75 kN·m/kg · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleER308HER317

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityER308HER317
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

ER308H vs ER317 — frequently asked

What is the difference between ER308H and ER317?

Stainless Steel ER308H and ER317 are both stainless steel grades. Both yield at about 415 MPa — strength does not separate them. ER308H conducts heat better (16.2 W/m·K vs 14.5 W/m·K).

Which is cheaper, ER308H or ER317?

ER308H is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while ER317 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, ER308H or ER317?

ER308H. Its machinability rates fair (38/100) against poor (30/100) for ER317.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ER308H and ER317 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.