FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel ER16-8-2 vs ER308H

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel ER16-8-2 and ER308H are both stainless steel grades. Both yield at about 400 MPa — strength does not separate them. On the shop floor, ER308H welds better (excellent vs very good), ER16-8-2 forms better (65 vs 55 out of 100), and ER308H sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than ER16-8-2 (high, $$$$).

ER308HChoose it when it will be welded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

ER16-8-2 vs ER308H: properties

ER16-8-2ER308H

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

76 GPa11 Msi
77 GPa11.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

585 MPa84.8 ksi
590 MPa85.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

400 MPa58 ksi
415 MPa60.2 ksi

Reduction in Area

50%
55%

Compressive Strength

410 MPa59.5 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Shear Strength

390 MPa56.6 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

150 MPa·√m137 ksi·√in
180 MPa·√m164 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

90 J66.4 ft·lbf
85 J62.7 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

180 HB
175 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

88 HRB
87 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

190 HV
185 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 196 GPa28.4 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Elongation at Break 38%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Liquidus Temperature

1,445°C2,633 °F
1,450°C2,642 °F

Same in both: Density 7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,400°C2,552 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

15 W/m·K8.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
16.2 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

275 J/g118 BTU/lb
285 J/g123 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

760°C1,400 °F
800°C1,472 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 16.5 µm/m·K9.2 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.3 % IACS
2.4 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m29.5 µΩ·in
7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.05 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 58 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
38 / 100

Weldability

78 / 100
88 / 100

Formability (cold)

65 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 40% · Brazeability / Solderability 60 / 100 · Polishability 65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Typical Recycled Content

55%
60%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 4.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

74 kN·m/kg
75 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

408 kJ/m³
439 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.8 mm²/s
4.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 24.8 MN·m/kg · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleER308HER16-8-2

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityER16-8-2ER308H
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

ER16-8-2 vs ER308H — frequently asked

What is the difference between ER16-8-2 and ER308H?

Stainless Steel ER16-8-2 and ER308H are both stainless steel grades. Both yield at about 400 MPa — strength does not separate them. On the shop floor, ER308H welds better (excellent vs very good), ER16-8-2 forms better (65 vs 55 out of 100), and ER308H sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than ER16-8-2 (high, $$$$).

Which is cheaper, ER16-8-2 or ER308H?

ER308H is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while ER16-8-2 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, ER16-8-2 or ER308H?

ER308H. Its weldability rates excellent (88/100) against very good (78/100) for ER16-8-2.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ER16-8-2 and ER308H side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.