FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel E383 vs ER308H

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel E383 and ER308H are both stainless steel grades. ER308H is the stronger of the two: yield strength 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) against 390 MPa (56.6 ksi) for E383, about 6% more. E383 is harder — 185 HB against 175 HB for ER308H — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. ER308H runs hotter in service (800°C vs 500°C continuous) and ER308H conducts heat better (16.2 W/m·K vs 11.5 W/m·K). On the shop floor, ER308H machines more easily (fair vs poor), ER308H welds better (excellent vs very good), and ER308H sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than E383 (high, $$$$).

E383Choose it when surface hardness matters.

ER308HChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

E383 vs ER308H: properties

E383ER308H

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

195 GPa28.3 Msi
196 GPa28.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

75 GPa10.9 Msi
77 GPa11.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

580 MPa84.1 ksi
590 MPa85.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

390 MPa56.6 ksi
415 MPa60.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

35%
38%

Reduction in Area

45%
55%

Compressive Strength

395 MPa57.3 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Shear Strength

380 MPa55.1 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

130 MPa·√m118 ksi·√in
180 MPa·√m164 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
85 J62.7 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

185 HB
175 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

90 HRB
87 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

195 HV
185 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 230 MPa33.4 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,355°C2,471 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,400°C2,552 °F
1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

11.5 W/m·K6.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
16.2 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

14.5 µm/m·K8.1 µin/in·°F
16.5 µm/m·K9.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

275 J/g118 BTU/lb
285 J/g123 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

500°C932 °F
800°C1,472 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.7 % IACS
2.4 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1×10⁻⁶ Ω·m39.4 µΩ·in
7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.05 V

Corrosion Resistance

86 / 100
58 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
38 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

28%
40%

Weldability

70 / 100
88 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

—
60 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 55 / 100 · Polishability 65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

82 MJ/kg35,254 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

6.5 kg CO₂/kg
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb
130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

40%
60%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

73 kN·m/kg
75 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.4 MN·m/kg
24.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

390 kJ/m³
439 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.1 mm²/s
4.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

2
3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleER308HE383

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityE383ER308H
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

E383 vs ER308H — frequently asked

Is ER308H stronger than E383?

Yes. ER308H has a typical yield strength of 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) against 390 MPa (56.6 ksi) for E383 — about 6% more. Tensile strength is 590 MPa (85.6 ksi) vs 580 MPa (84.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, E383 or ER308H?

ER308H is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while E383 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, E383 or ER308H?

ER308H. Its machinability rates fair (38/100) against poor (25/100) for E383; for welding the order is ER308H first (excellent, 88/100) then E383 (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in E383 and ER308H side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.