FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel E316 vs ER308H

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel E316 and ER308H are both stainless steel grades. Both yield at about 420 MPa — strength does not separate them. E316 is harder — 185 HB against 175 HB for ER308H — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. ER308H runs hotter in service (800°C vs 400°C continuous).

E316Choose it when surface hardness matters.

ER308HChoose it when the part sees heat.

E316 vs ER308H: properties

E316ER308H

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

193 GPa28 Msi
196 GPa28.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

166 GPa24.1 Msi
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

570 MPa82.7 ksi
590 MPa85.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

420 MPa60.9 ksi
415 MPa60.2 ksi

Reduction in Area

50%
55%

Shear Strength

350 MPa50.8 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

130 MPa·√m118 ksi·√in
180 MPa·√m164 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
85 J62.7 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

185 HB
175 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

90 HRB
87 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

195 HV
185 HV

Compressive Strength

—
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Same in both: Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Elongation at Break 38%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.95 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,385°C2,525 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,440°C2,624 °F
1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

15 W/m·K8.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
16.2 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16 µm/m·K8.9 µin/in·°F
16.5 µm/m·K9.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
285 J/g123 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
800°C1,472 °F

Min Service Temperature

-120°C-184 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.3 % IACS
2.4 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m29.1 µΩ·in
7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
58 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.05 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
38 / 100

Weldability

92 / 100
88 / 100

Formability (cold)

50 / 100
55 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 40%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb
130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 4.5 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 60%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

72 kN·m/kg
75 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.3 MN·m/kg
24.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

457 kJ/m³
439 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.8 mm²/s
4.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleER308HE316

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityE316ER308H
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

E316 vs ER308H — frequently asked

What is the difference between E316 and ER308H?

Stainless Steel E316 and ER308H are both stainless steel grades. Both yield at about 420 MPa — strength does not separate them. E316 is harder — 185 HB against 175 HB for ER308H — which matters for wear surfaces and threads.

Which is cheaper, E316 or ER308H?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose E316 over ER308H?

Pick E316 when surface hardness matters. Pick ER308H when the part sees heat.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in E316 and ER308H side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.