FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel E2594 vs ER308H

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel E2594 and ER308H are both stainless steel grades. E2594 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 680 MPa (98.6 ksi) against 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) for ER308H, about 64% more; tensile strength follows at 870 MPa (126 ksi) vs 590 MPa (85.6 ksi). In exchange, ER308H is the more ductile: elongation 38% versus 26% for E2594, and E2594 is harder (270 HB vs 175 HB). ER308H runs hotter in service (800°C vs 250°C continuous). On the shop floor, ER308H machines more easily (fair vs poor) and ER308H sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than E2594 (high, $$$$).

E2594Choose it when strength drives the design.

ER308HChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

E2594 vs ER308H: properties

E2594ER308H

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
196 GPa28.4 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

870 MPa126 ksi
590 MPa85.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

680 MPa98.6 ksi
415 MPa60.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

26%
38%

Reduction in Area

45%
55%

Shear Strength

520 MPa75.4 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

380 MPa55.1 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

90 MPa·√m81.9 ksi·√in
180 MPa·√m164 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

70 J51.6 ft·lbf
85 J62.7 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

270 HB
175 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

27 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

285 HV
185 HV

Compressive Strength

—
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
87 HRB

Same in both: Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.8 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,350°C2,462 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,440°C2,624 °F
1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

15 W/m·K8.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
16.2 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

13 µm/m·K7.2 µin/in·°F
16.5 µm/m·K9.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
285 J/g123 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
800°C1,472 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.2 % IACS
2.4 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m31.5 µΩ·in
7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.12 V
-0.05 V

Corrosion Resistance

86 / 100
58 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
38 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
40%

Weldability

80 / 100
88 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
65 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

—
60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.2 kg CO₂/kg
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

45%
60%

Same in both: Embodied Water 130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

112 kN·m/kg
75 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.6 MN·m/kg
24.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,156 kJ/m³
439 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

4 mm²/s
4.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

5
3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleER308HE2594

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityE2594ER308H
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

E2594 vs ER308H — frequently asked

Is E2594 stronger than ER308H?

Yes. E2594 has a typical yield strength of 680 MPa (98.6 ksi) against 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) for ER308H — about 64% more. Tensile strength is 870 MPa (126 ksi) vs 590 MPa (85.6 ksi).

Which is cheaper, E2594 or ER308H?

ER308H is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while E2594 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, E2594 or ER308H?

ER308H. Its machinability rates fair (38/100) against poor (25/100) for E2594; for welding the order is ER308H first (excellent, 88/100) then E2594 (very good, 80/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in E2594 and ER308H side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.