FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel Almar 362 vs Discaloy

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel Almar 362 and Discaloy are both stainless steel grades. Almar 362 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,205 MPa (175 ksi) against 730 MPa (106 ksi) for Discaloy, about 65% more; tensile strength follows at 1,275 MPa (185 ksi) vs 1,000 MPa (145 ksi). In exchange, Discaloy is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 15% for Almar 362, and Almar 362 is harder (375 HB vs 290 HB). Discaloy runs hotter in service (650°C vs 425°C continuous) and Almar 362 conducts heat better (16.5 W/m·K vs 14 W/m·K). On the shop floor, Almar 362 machines more easily (32 vs 18 out of 100) and Almar 362 welds better (good vs fair).

Almar 362Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

DiscaloyChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

Almar 362 vs Discaloy: properties

Almar 362Discaloy

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
196 GPa28.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

77 GPa11.2 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Bulk Modulus

160 GPa23.2 Msi
165 GPa23.9 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.28
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,275 MPa185 ksi
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

1,205 MPa175 ksi
730 MPa106 ksi

Elongation at Break

15%
20%

Reduction in Area

55%
30%

Compressive Strength

1,240 MPa180 ksi
—

Shear Strength

760 MPa110 ksi
640 MPa92.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

650 MPa94.3 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

80 MPa·√m72.8 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

34 J25.1 ft·lbf
35 J25.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

375 HB
290 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

40 HRC
30 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

400 HV
305 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.76 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.97 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,400°C2,552 °F
1,380°C2,516 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,450°C2,642 °F
1,430°C2,606 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

16.5 W/m·K9.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
14 W/m·K8.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

10.8 µm/m·K6 µin/in·°F
15.5 µm/m·K8.6 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

425°C797 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.2 % IACS
1.9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m31.5 µΩ·in
9.1×10⁻⁷ Ω·m35.8 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
—

Corrosion Resistance

50 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

32 / 100
18 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
14%

Weldability

60 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

75 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

—
35 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

58 MJ/kg24,936 BTU/lb
80 MJ/kg34,394 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.6 kg CO₂/kg
5.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
190 L/kg22.8 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

40%
35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

164 kN·m/kg
125 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.8 MN·m/kg
24.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

3,630 kJ/m³
1,359 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

4.6 mm²/s
3.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
5

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAlmar 362Discaloy

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAlmar 362Discaloy
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

Almar 362 vs Discaloy — frequently asked

Is Almar 362 stronger than Discaloy?

Yes. Almar 362 has a typical yield strength of 1,205 MPa (175 ksi) against 730 MPa (106 ksi) for Discaloy — about 65% more. Tensile strength is 1,275 MPa (185 ksi) vs 1,000 MPa (145 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Almar 362 or Discaloy?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Almar 362 or Discaloy?

Almar 362, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 32/100 against 18/100 for Discaloy; for welding the order is Almar 362 first (good, 60/100) then Discaloy (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Almar 362 and Discaloy side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.