FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 310 vs 660

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 310 and 660 are both stainless steel grades, both heat resistant ss. 660 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 690 MPa (100 ksi) against 655 MPa (95 ksi) for 310, about 5% more. In exchange, 310 is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 40% for 660, and 660 is harder (160 HB vs 150 HB). 310 runs hotter in service (1,050°C vs 540°C continuous) and 310 conducts electricity better (2.2 % IACS vs 1.9 % IACS). On the shop floor, 310 welds better (65 vs 55 out of 100) and 660 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than 310 (specialty, $$$$$).

310Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

660Choose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

310 vs 660: properties

310660

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
201 GPa29.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

158 GPa22.9 Msi
176 GPa25.5 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.31

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

655 MPa95 ksi
690 MPa100 ksi

Elongation at Break

45%
40%

Reduction in Area

60%
50%

Compressive Strength

310 MPa45 ksi
—

Shear Strength

430 MPa62.4 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

160 MPa·√m146 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

130 J95.9 ft·lbf
120 J88.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
160 HB

Hardness, Vickers

160 HV
—

Same in both: Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi · Yield Strength (0.2% offset) 310 MPa45 ksi · Hardness, Rockwell B 85 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
7.94 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,400°C2,552 °F
1,370°C2,498 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,450°C2,642 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

14.2 W/m·K8.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
13.4 W/m·K7.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F
460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

15.9 µm/m·K8.8 µin/in·°F
16.6 µm/m·K9.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

280 J/g120 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,050°C1,922 °F
540°C1,004 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.2 % IACS
1.9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m30.7 µΩ·in
9.1×10⁻⁷ Ω·m35.8 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.08 V
-0.1 V

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
28 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
25%

Weldability

65 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
60 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
50 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb
95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.5 kg CO₂/kg
6.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

210 L/kg25.2 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

45%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

83 kN·m/kg
87 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

240 kJ/m³
239 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.6 mm²/s
3.7 mm²/s

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 25.3 MN·m/kg · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale310660

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability310660
Default conditionSolution AnnealedSolution Annealed
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 32 finishes: AlCrN, AlTiN, Black Oxide, CVD Al2O3, CVD TiCN, CVD TiN, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, CrN, DLC, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing and 20 more.

310 vs 660 — frequently asked

Is 660 stronger than 310?

Yes. 660 has a typical tensile strength of 690 MPa (100 ksi) against 655 MPa (95 ksi) for 310 — about 5% more.

Which is cheaper, 310 or 660?

660 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while 310 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 310 or 660?

310. Its machinability rates fair (35/100) against poor (28/100) for 660; for welding the order is 310 first (good, 65/100) then 660 (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 310 and 660 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.