FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 305 Cold Drawn vs 305 Full Hard

Stainless Steel · 305 temper comparison

305 Cold Drawn and 305 Full Hard are two conditions of the same stainless steel grade, 305: Cold Drawn versus Full Hard. The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 305 Full Hard is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,000 MPa (145 ksi) against 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) for 305 Cold Drawn, about 133% more; tensile strength follows at 1,275 MPa (185 ksi) vs 655 MPa (95 ksi). In exchange, 305 Cold Drawn is the more ductile: elongation 32% versus 8% for 305 Full Hard, and 305 Full Hard is harder (360 HB vs 200 HB). 305 Cold Drawn runs hotter in service (760°C vs 300°C continuous). On the shop floor, 305 Cold Drawn welds better (very good vs good).

305 Cold DrawnChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

305 Full HardChoose it when strength drives the design.

305 Cold Drawn vs 305 Full Hard: properties

305 Cold Drawn305 Full Hard

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

193 GPa28 Msi
190 GPa27.6 Msi

Bulk Modulus

150 GPa21.8 Msi
140 GPa20.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

655 MPa95 ksi
1,275 MPa185 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

430 MPa62.4 ksi
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Elongation at Break

32%
8%

Reduction in Area

55%
30%

Compressive Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
960 MPa139 ksi

Shear Strength

430 MPa62.4 ksi
765 MPa111 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

220 MPa·√m200 ksi·√in
80 MPa·√m72.8 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

120 J88.5 ft·lbf
35 J25.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

200 HB
360 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

94 HRB
80 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

210 HV
380 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.93 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 1,400°C2,552 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.3 µm/m·K9.6 µin/in·°F
17.2 µm/m·K9.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

760°C1,400 °F
300°C572 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 16.2 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 285 J/g123 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 2.4 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

63 / 100
62 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.08 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

75 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

65 / 100
25 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

65 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

82 / 100
85 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 45 / 100 · Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 50% · Castability 40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

53 MJ/kg22,786 BTU/lb
82 MJ/kg35,254 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.6 kg CO₂/kg
6.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

150 L/kg18 gal/lb
210 L/kg25.2 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 60%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale305

305 Cold Drawn vs 305 Full Hard — frequently asked

Is 305 Full Hard stronger than 305 Cold Drawn?

Yes. 305 Full Hard has a typical yield strength of 1,000 MPa (145 ksi) against 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) for 305 Cold Drawn — about 133% more. Tensile strength is 1,275 MPa (185 ksi) vs 655 MPa (95 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, Cold Drawn or Full Hard?

Annealed is the default 305 condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither Cold Drawn nor Full Hard). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which welds better, 305 Cold Drawn or 305 Full Hard?

305 Cold Drawn. Its weldability rates very good (75/100) against good (55/100) for 305 Full Hard.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 305 Cold Drawn and 305 Full Hard side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.