FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 305-1/2 Hard vs 305 Cold Drawn

Stainless Steel · 305 temper comparison

305-1/2 Hard and 305 Cold Drawn are two conditions of the same stainless steel grade, 305: 1/2 Hard (half hard) versus Cold Drawn. The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 305-1/2 Hard is the stronger of the two: yield strength 760 MPa (110 ksi) against 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) for 305 Cold Drawn, about 77% more; tensile strength follows at 1,035 MPa (150 ksi) vs 655 MPa (95 ksi). In exchange, 305 Cold Drawn is the more ductile: elongation 32% versus 12% for 305-1/2 Hard, and 305-1/2 Hard is harder (300 HB vs 200 HB). 305 Cold Drawn runs hotter in service (760°C vs 300°C continuous). On the shop floor, 305 Cold Drawn welds better (very good vs good).

305-1/2 HardChoose it when strength drives the design.

305 Cold DrawnChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

305-1/2 Hard vs 305 Cold Drawn: properties

305-1/2 Hard305 Cold Drawn

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

140 GPa20.3 Msi
150 GPa21.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,035 MPa150 ksi
655 MPa95 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

760 MPa110 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
32%

Reduction in Area

40%
55%

Compressive Strength

730 MPa106 ksi
260 MPa37.7 ksi

Shear Strength

620 MPa89.9 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

400 MPa58 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in
220 MPa·√m200 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
120 J88.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

300 HB
200 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

80 HRB
94 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

320 HV
210 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 193 GPa28 Msi · Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
7.93 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 1,400°C2,552 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.2 µm/m·K9.6 µin/in·°F
17.3 µm/m·K9.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
760°C1,400 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 16.2 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 285 J/g123 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 2.4 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.08 V · Corrosion Resistance 63 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

44 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

48%
50%

Weldability

62 / 100
75 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
65 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
65 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
82 / 100

Same in both: Castability 40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

82 MJ/kg35,254 BTU/lb
53 MJ/kg22,786 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

6.2 kg CO₂/kg
4.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

210 L/kg25.2 gal/lb
150 L/kg18 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 60%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale305

305-1/2 Hard vs 305 Cold Drawn — frequently asked

Is 305-1/2 Hard stronger than 305 Cold Drawn?

Yes. 305-1/2 Hard has a typical yield strength of 760 MPa (110 ksi) against 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) for 305 Cold Drawn — about 77% more. Tensile strength is 1,035 MPa (150 ksi) vs 655 MPa (95 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, 1/2 Hard or Cold Drawn?

Annealed is the default 305 condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither 1/2 Hard nor Cold Drawn). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which welds better, 305-1/2 Hard or 305 Cold Drawn?

305 Cold Drawn. Its weldability rates very good (75/100) against good (62/100) for 305-1/2 Hard.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 305-1/2 Hard and 305 Cold Drawn side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.