FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 304 vs 321

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 304 and 321 are both stainless steel grades. 321 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) against 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) for 304, about 6% more. In exchange, 304 is the more ductile: elongation 55% versus 45% for 321. On the shop floor, 304 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than 321 (high, $$$$).

304Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

321Choose it when strength drives the design.

304 vs 321: properties

304321

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

152 GPa22 Msi
150 GPa21.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

585 MPa84.8 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

55%
45%

Reduction in Area

70%
65%

Compressive Strength

250 MPa36.3 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Shear Strength

415 MPa60.2 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

220 MPa·√m200 ksi·√in
200 MPa·√m182 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

200 J148 ft·lbf
120 J88.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

82 HRB
80 HRB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 193 GPa28 Msi · Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 250 MPa36.3 ksi · Hardness, Brinell 150 HB · Hardness, Vickers 160 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,400°C2,552 °F
1,398°C2,548 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,450°C2,642 °F
1,427°C2,601 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

16.2 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
16.1 W/m·K9.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.3 µm/m·K9.6 µin/in·°F
16.6 µm/m·K9.2 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 285 J/g123 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 870°C1,598 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 2.4 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
64 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.05 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
38 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
78 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

65 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

88 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 45% · Weldability 88 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

53 MJ/kg22,786 BTU/lb
60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.4 kg CO₂/kg
6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

70%
60%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

73 kN·m/kg
78 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.1 MN·m/kg
24.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

162 kJ/m³
149 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 4.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale304321

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability304321
Casting & forgingYes—
Default conditionAnnealedSolution Annealed
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 32 finishes: AlCrN, AlTiN, Black Oxide, CVD Al2O3, CVD TiCN, CVD TiN, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, CrN, DLC, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing and 20 more.

304 vs 321 — frequently asked

Is 321 stronger than 304?

Yes. 321 has a typical tensile strength of 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) against 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) for 304 — about 6% more.

Which is cheaper, 304 or 321?

304 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while 321 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 304 or 321?

304, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 38/100 for 321.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 304 and 321 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.