FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 304 vs 310L NAG

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 304 and 310L NAG are both stainless steel grades. 310L NAG is the stronger of the two: yield strength 305 MPa (44.2 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for 304, about 22% more; tensile strength follows at 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 585 MPa (84.8 ksi). In exchange, 304 is the more ductile: elongation 55% versus 48% for 310L NAG, and 310L NAG is harder (165 HB vs 150 HB). 310L NAG is lighter (7.5 g/cm³ vs 8 g/cm³ for 304) and 304 runs hotter in service (870°C vs 600°C continuous). On the shop floor, 304 machines more easily (fair vs poor), 304 welds better (excellent vs very good), and 304 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than 310L NAG (high, $$$$).

304Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

310L NAGChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

304 vs 310L NAG: properties

304310L NAG

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

77 GPa11.2 Msi
75 GPa10.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

152 GPa22 Msi
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

585 MPa84.8 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
305 MPa44.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

55%
48%

Reduction in Area

70%
60%

Compressive Strength

250 MPa36.3 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Shear Strength

415 MPa60.2 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

220 MPa·√m200 ksi·√in
200 MPa·√m182 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

200 J148 ft·lbf
160 J118 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
165 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

82 HRB
85 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

160 HV
175 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 193 GPa28 Msi · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 250 MPa36.3 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
7.5 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,400°C2,552 °F
1,370°C2,498 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,450°C2,642 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

16.2 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
13 W/m·K7.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.3 µm/m·K9.6 µin/in·°F
15.7 µm/m·K8.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

285 J/g123 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

870°C1,598 °F
600°C1,112 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.4 % IACS
1.9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in
9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m35.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.05 V
-0.08 V

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
30%

Weldability

88 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
75 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

65 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

88 / 100
75 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

53 MJ/kg22,786 BTU/lb
57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.4 kg CO₂/kg
5.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb
180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

70%
55%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

73 kN·m/kg
83 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.1 MN·m/kg
25.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

162 kJ/m³
241 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

4.1 mm²/s
3.5 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale304310L NAG

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability304310L NAG
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Casting & forgingYes—
Default conditionAnnealed—
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Passivation (Stainless Steel)Yes—

They share 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

304 vs 310L NAG — frequently asked

Is 310L NAG stronger than 304?

Yes. 310L NAG has a typical yield strength of 305 MPa (44.2 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for 304 — about 22% more. Tensile strength is 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 585 MPa (84.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 304 or 310L NAG?

304 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while 310L NAG is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 304 or 310L NAG?

304. Its machinability rates fair (45/100) against poor (30/100) for 310L NAG; for welding the order is 304 first (excellent, 88/100) then 310L NAG (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 304 and 310L NAG side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.