FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 15-5 PH vs Alloy 465

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 15-5 PH and Alloy 465 are both stainless steel grades. Alloy 465 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,586 MPa (230 ksi) against 795 MPa (115 ksi) for 15-5 PH, about 99% more; tensile strength follows at 1,655 MPa (240 ksi) vs 1,030 MPa (149 ksi). Alloy 465 is harder — 435 HB against 311 HB for 15-5 PH — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. Alloy 465 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 300°C continuous) and 15-5 PH conducts heat better (17.9 W/m·K vs 16 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 15-5 PH machines more easily (fair vs poor), 15-5 PH welds better (very good vs good), and 15-5 PH forms better (fair vs not recommended).

15-5 PHChoose it when the part is machined in volume, or when it will be welded.

Alloy 465Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

15-5 PH vs Alloy 465: properties

15-5 PHAlloy 465

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

196 GPa28.4 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Bulk Modulus

148 GPa21.5 Msi
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.27
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,030 MPa149 ksi
1,655 MPa240 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

795 MPa115 ksi
1,586 MPa230 ksi

Reduction in Area

55%
60%

Compressive Strength

810 MPa117 ksi
1,620 MPa235 ksi

Shear Strength

640 MPa92.8 ksi
985 MPa143 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

480 MPa69.6 ksi
745 MPa108 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

30 J22.1 ft·lbf
38 J28 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

311 HB
435 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

33 HRC
46 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

330 HV
460 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi · Elongation at Break 14% · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.8 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.78 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 1,400°C2,552 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,440°C2,624 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

17.9 W/m·K10.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
16 W/m·K9.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

10.8 µm/m·K6 µin/in·°F
10.4 µm/m·K5.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
400°C752 °F

Min Service Temperature

-73°C-99 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 2.2 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m31.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.25 V

Corrosion Resistance

57 / 100
55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

42 / 100
28 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
30%

Weldability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
12 / 100

Castability

55 / 100
25 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
85 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
80 MJ/kg34,394 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.5 kg CO₂/kg
6.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

190 L/kg22.8 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

132 kN·m/kg
213 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.1 MN·m/kg
25.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,612 kJ/m³
6,288 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

5.5 mm²/s
4.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

9
13

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale15-5 PHAlloy 465

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability15-5 PHAlloy 465
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
3D printingYes—
Default conditionCondition A—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
Electropolished (Metal AM)Yes—
ElectropolishingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—

They share 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

15-5 PH vs Alloy 465 — frequently asked

Is Alloy 465 stronger than 15-5 PH?

Yes. Alloy 465 has a typical yield strength of 1,586 MPa (230 ksi) against 795 MPa (115 ksi) for 15-5 PH — about 99% more. Tensile strength is 1,655 MPa (240 ksi) vs 1,030 MPa (149 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 15-5 PH or Alloy 465?

Alloy 465 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while 15-5 PH is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 15-5 PH or Alloy 465?

15-5 PH. Its machinability rates fair (42/100) against poor (28/100) for Alloy 465; for welding the order is 15-5 PH first (very good, 70/100) then Alloy 465 (good, 60/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 15-5 PH and Alloy 465 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.