FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.4905 vs 416

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 1.4905 and 416 are both stainless steel grades. 1.4905 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) against 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) for 416, about 89% more; tensile strength follows at 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 515 MPa (74.7 ksi). In exchange, 416 is the more ductile: elongation 30% versus 22% for 1.4905, and 1.4905 is harder (220 HB vs 155 HB). 1.4905 is stiffer (218 GPa vs 200 GPa). On the shop floor, 416 machines more easily (very good vs fair), 1.4905 welds better (fair vs poor), and 416 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than 1.4905 (high, $$$$).

1.4905Choose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

416Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

1.4905 vs 416: properties

1.4905416

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

218 GPa31.6 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Shear Modulus

84 GPa12.2 Msi
77 GPa11.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.28

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

700 MPa102 ksi
515 MPa74.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

520 MPa75.4 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

22%
30%

Reduction in Area

62%
60%

Compressive Strength

530 MPa76.9 ksi
—

Shear Strength

420 MPa60.9 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

330 MPa47.9 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

100 MPa·√m91 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
90 J66.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

220 HB
155 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

20 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

230 HV
—

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
82 HRB

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.75 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.7 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,420°C2,588 °F
1,450°C2,642 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,490°C2,714 °F
1,510°C2,750 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

26 W/m·K15 BTU/hr·ft·°F
24.9 W/m·K14.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

10.8 µm/m·K6 µin/in·°F
9.9 µm/m·K5.5 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
260 J/g112 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

600°C1,112 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

5.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m22.8 µΩ·in
5.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m22.4 µΩ·in

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 3 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.4 V
-0.35 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
80 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
85%

Weldability

40 / 100
22 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
30 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

36 MJ/kg15,477 BTU/lb
48 MJ/kg20,636 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.9 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

70 L/kg8.4 gal/lb
180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

40%
65%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

90 kN·m/kg
67 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

28.1 MN·m/kg
26 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

620 kJ/m³
189 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

7.3 mm²/s
7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

8
6

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale4161.4905

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1.4905416
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition—Annealed
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Passivation (Stainless Steel)—Yes

They share 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

1.4905 vs 416 — frequently asked

Is 1.4905 stronger than 416?

Yes. 1.4905 has a typical yield strength of 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) against 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) for 416 — about 89% more. Tensile strength is 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 515 MPa (74.7 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1.4905 or 416?

416 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while 1.4905 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 1.4905 or 416?

416. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against fair (35/100) for 1.4905; for welding the order is 1.4905 first (fair, 40/100) then 416 (poor, 22/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.4905 and 416 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.