FabDigitFabDigit

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy Sn60Pb39Cu1 vs Sn60Pb40Sb

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy · grade comparison

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy Sn60Pb39Cu1 and Sn60Pb40Sb are both solder & low-melting alloy grades. Sn60Pb40Sb is the stronger of the two: yield strength 32 MPa (4.64 ksi) against 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) for Sn60Pb39Cu1, about 7% more. Sn60Pb39Cu1 is harder — 16 HB against 15 HB for Sn60Pb40Sb — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. Sn60Pb40Sb runs hotter in service (110°C vs 100°C continuous). On the shop floor, Sn60Pb40Sb machines more easily (fair vs poor) and Sn60Pb39Cu1 welds better (poor vs not recommended).

Sn60Pb39Cu1Choose it when surface hardness matters, or when it will be welded.

Sn60Pb40SbChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Sn60Pb39Cu1 vs Sn60Pb40Sb: properties

Sn60Pb39Cu1Sn60Pb40Sb

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

30 GPa4.4 Msi
31 GPa4.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

11 GPa1.6 Msi
11.5 GPa1.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

43 GPa6.2 Msi
42 GPa6.1 Msi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

30 MPa4.4 ksi
32 MPa4.6 ksi

Shear Strength

36 MPa5.2 ksi
38 MPa5.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

16 MPa2.3 ksi
15 MPa2.2 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

16 HB
15 HB

Hardness, Vickers

17 HV
16 HV

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
6 J4.4 ft·lbf

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.38 · Tensile Strength (Ultimate) 52 MPa7.5 ksi · Elongation at Break 35%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Liquidus Temperature

192°C378 °F
190°C374 °F

Same in both: Density 8.5 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 183°C361 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

180 J/kg·K0.04 BTU/lb·°F
176 J/kg·K0.04 BTU/lb·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

42 J/g18.1 BTU/lb
43 J/g18.5 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

100°C212 °F
110°C230 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 50 W/m·K28.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 24.5 µm/m·K13.6 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -55°C-67 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 11.5 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 1.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.91 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.5 V · Corrosion Resistance 45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

20 / 100
35 / 100

Weldability

20 / 100
10 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
85 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
95 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

98 / 100
92 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
190 MJ/kg81,685 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

10.5 kg CO₂/kg
10.3 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

3.5 MN·m/kg
3.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

15 kJ/m³
17 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

32.7 mm²/s
33.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

4
3

Same in both: Specific Strength (UTS / density) 6 kN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every solder & low-melting alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

125102050891011Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleSn60Pb40SbSn60Pb39Cu1

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilitySn60Pb39Cu1Sn60Pb40Sb
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Sn60Pb39Cu1 vs Sn60Pb40Sb — frequently asked

Is Sn60Pb40Sb stronger than Sn60Pb39Cu1?

Yes. Sn60Pb40Sb has a typical yield strength of 32 MPa (4.64 ksi) against 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) for Sn60Pb39Cu1 — about 7% more. Tensile strength is 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) vs 52 MPa (7.54 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Sn60Pb39Cu1 or Sn60Pb40Sb?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Sn60Pb39Cu1 or Sn60Pb40Sb?

Sn60Pb40Sb. Its machinability rates fair (35/100) against poor (20/100) for Sn60Pb39Cu1; for welding the order is Sn60Pb39Cu1 first (poor, 20/100) then Sn60Pb40Sb (not recommended, 10/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Sn60Pb39Cu1 and Sn60Pb40Sb side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.