FabDigitFabDigit

Refractory Metal Mo1/Mo2 vs TZC

Refractory Metal · grade comparison

Refractory Metal Mo1/Mo2 and TZC are both refractory metal grades. TZC is the stronger of the two: yield strength 930 MPa (135 ksi) against 580 MPa (84.1 ksi) for Mo1/Mo2, about 60% more; tensile strength follows at 1,050 MPa (152 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi). In exchange, Mo1/Mo2 is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 8% for TZC, and TZC is harder (30 HRC vs 21 HRC). TZC runs hotter in service (1,500°C vs 1,000°C continuous) and Mo1/Mo2 conducts heat better (138 W/m·K vs 105 W/m·K).

Mo1/Mo2Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

TZCChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Mo1/Mo2 vs TZC: properties

Mo1/Mo2TZC

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

320 GPa46.4 Msi
315 GPa45.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

125 GPa18.1 Msi
122 GPa17.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

262 GPa38 Msi
280 GPa40.6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.31
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

700 MPa102 ksi
1,050 MPa152 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

580 MPa84.1 ksi
930 MPa135 ksi

Elongation at Break

18%
8%

Reduction in Area

45%
20%

Compressive Strength

600 MPa87 ksi
1,100 MPa160 ksi

Shear Strength

420 MPa60.9 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

8 J5.9 ft·lbf
5 J3.7 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

225 HB
—

Hardness, Rockwell C

21 HRC
30 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

240 HV
300 HV

Same in both: Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 18 MPa·√m16.4 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

10.22 g/cm³0.37 lb/in³
10.05 g/cm³0.36 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

2,620°C4,748 °F
2,590°C4,694 °F

Liquidus Temperature

2,623°C4,753 °F
2,620°C4,748 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

138 W/m·K79.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
105 W/m·K60.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

251 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F
250 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

5 µm/m·K2.8 µin/in·°F
5.3 µm/m·K2.9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

390 J/g168 BTU/lb
375 J/g161 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,000°C1,832 °F
1,500°C2,732 °F

Min Service Temperature

0°C32 °F
20°C68 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

32 % IACS
20 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.13 µΩ·in
8.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m3.35 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
45 / 100

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

—
-0.2 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
32 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
35%

Weldability

20 / 100
15 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
20 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

75 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

—
25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

150 MJ/kg64,488 BTU/lb
210 MJ/kg90,284 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

10 kg CO₂/kg
15 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb
900 L/kg108 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

68 kN·m/kg
104 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

526 kJ/m³
1,373 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

53.8 mm²/s
41.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

60
66

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 31.3 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every refractory metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1502003005007001,0001,5005101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleTZCMo1/Mo2

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityMo1/Mo2TZC
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Mo1/Mo2 vs TZC — frequently asked

Is TZC stronger than Mo1/Mo2?

Yes. TZC has a typical yield strength of 930 MPa (135 ksi) against 580 MPa (84.1 ksi) for Mo1/Mo2 — about 60% more. Tensile strength is 1,050 MPa (152 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Mo1/Mo2 or TZC?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Mo1/Mo2 or TZC?

Mo1/Mo2. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against poor (32/100) for TZC; for welding the order is Mo1/Mo2 first (poor, 20/100) then TZC (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Mo1/Mo2 and TZC side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.