FabDigitFabDigit

Refractory Metal Mo-La vs TZC

Refractory Metal · grade comparison

Refractory Metal Mo-La and TZC are both refractory metal grades. TZC is the stronger of the two: yield strength 930 MPa (135 ksi) against 560 MPa (81.2 ksi) for Mo-La, about 66% more; tensile strength follows at 1,050 MPa (152 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi). TZC is harder — 30 HRC against 21 HRC for Mo-La — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. Mo-La runs hotter in service (1,700°C vs 1,500°C continuous) and Mo-La conducts heat better (120 W/m·K vs 105 W/m·K). On the shop floor, TZC sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than Mo-La (specialty, $$$$$).

Mo-LaChoose it when the part sees heat.

TZCChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

Mo-La vs TZC: properties

Mo-LaTZC

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

320 GPa46.4 Msi
315 GPa45.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

265 GPa38.4 Msi
280 GPa40.6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.31
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

700 MPa102 ksi
1,050 MPa152 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

560 MPa81.2 ksi
930 MPa135 ksi

Reduction in Area

25%
20%

Compressive Strength

800 MPa116 ksi
1,100 MPa160 ksi

Shear Strength

420 MPa60.9 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in
18 MPa·√m16.4 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

6 J4.4 ft·lbf
5 J3.7 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

228 HB
—

Hardness, Rockwell B

99 HRB
—

Hardness, Rockwell C

21 HRC
30 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

240 HV
300 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 122 GPa17.7 Msi · Elongation at Break 8%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

10.2 g/cm³0.37 lb/in³
10.05 g/cm³0.36 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

2,620°C4,748 °F
2,590°C4,694 °F

Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 2,620°C4,748 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

120 W/m·K69.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
105 W/m·K60.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

390 J/g168 BTU/lb
375 J/g161 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,700°C3,092 °F
1,500°C2,732 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
20°C68 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 250 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 5.3 µm/m·K2.9 µin/in·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

30 % IACS
20 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.7×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.24 µΩ·in
8.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m3.35 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
-0.2 V

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
32 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
35%

Weldability

20 / 100
15 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
20 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

—
25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

380 MJ/kg163,371 BTU/lb
210 MJ/kg90,284 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

25 kg CO₂/kg
15 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
900 L/kg108 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

69 kN·m/kg
104 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

31.4 MN·m/kg
31.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

490 kJ/m³
1,373 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

47.1 mm²/s
41.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

50
66

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every refractory metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1502003005007001,0001,5005101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleMo-LaTZC

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityMo-LaTZC
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Mo-La vs TZC — frequently asked

Is TZC stronger than Mo-La?

Yes. TZC has a typical yield strength of 930 MPa (135 ksi) against 560 MPa (81.2 ksi) for Mo-La — about 66% more. Tensile strength is 1,050 MPa (152 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Mo-La or TZC?

TZC is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while Mo-La is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, Mo-La or TZC?

Mo-La. Its weldability rates poor (20/100) against poor (15/100) for TZC.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Mo-La and TZC side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.