FabDigitFabDigit

Refractory Metal Mo-41Re vs Mo-La

Refractory Metal · grade comparison

Refractory Metal Mo-41Re and Mo-La are both refractory metal grades. Mo-41Re is the stronger of the two: yield strength 900 MPa (131 ksi) against 560 MPa (81.2 ksi) for Mo-La, about 61% more; tensile strength follows at 1,100 MPa (160 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi). Mo-41Re is the more ductile: elongation 15% versus 8% for Mo-La, and Mo-41Re is harder (33 HRC vs 21 HRC). Mo-La is lighter (10.2 g/cm³ vs 13.6 g/cm³ for Mo-41Re) and Mo-41Re is stiffer (360 GPa vs 320 GPa). On the shop floor, Mo-La machines more easily (fair vs poor), Mo-41Re welds better (very good vs poor), and Mo-41Re sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than Mo-La (specialty, $$$$$).

Mo-41ReChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Mo-LaChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part sees heat.

Mo-41Re vs Mo-La: properties

Mo-41ReMo-La

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

360 GPa52.2 Msi
320 GPa46.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

138 GPa20 Msi
122 GPa17.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

300 GPa43.5 Msi
265 GPa38.4 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.31

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,100 MPa160 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

900 MPa131 ksi
560 MPa81.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

15%
8%

Reduction in Area

35%
25%

Shear Strength

650 MPa94.3 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

450 MPa65.3 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

35 MPa·√m31.9 ksi·√in
20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell C

33 HRC
21 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

330 HV
240 HV

Compressive Strength

—
800 MPa116 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
6 J4.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

—
228 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
99 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

13.6 g/cm³0.49 lb/in³
10.2 g/cm³0.37 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

2,500°C4,532 °F
2,620°C4,748 °F

Liquidus Temperature

2,560°C4,640 °F
2,620°C4,748 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

45 W/m·K26 BTU/hr·ft·°F
120 W/m·K69.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

210 J/kg·K0.05 BTU/lb·°F
250 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

5.8 µm/m·K3.2 µin/in·°F
5.3 µm/m·K2.9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

300 J/g129 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,300°C2,372 °F
1,700°C3,092 °F

Min Service Temperature

-269°C-452 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

6.2 % IACS
30 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m11 µΩ·in
5.7×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.24 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.15 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

22 / 100
35 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

15%
40%

Weldability

70 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
25 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

65 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

900 MJ/kg386,931 BTU/lb
380 MJ/kg163,371 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

60 kg CO₂/kg
25 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

40%
25%

Embodied Water

—
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

81 kN·m/kg
69 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.5 MN·m/kg
31.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,125 kJ/m³
490 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

15.8 mm²/s
47.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

24
50

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every refractory metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1502003005007001,0001,5005101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleMo-LaMo-41Re

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityMo-41ReMo-La
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Mo-41Re vs Mo-La — frequently asked

Is Mo-41Re stronger than Mo-La?

Yes. Mo-41Re has a typical yield strength of 900 MPa (131 ksi) against 560 MPa (81.2 ksi) for Mo-La — about 61% more. Tensile strength is 1,100 MPa (160 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Mo-41Re or Mo-La?

Mo-41Re is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while Mo-La is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Mo-41Re or Mo-La?

Mo-La. Its machinability rates fair (35/100) against poor (22/100) for Mo-41Re; for welding the order is Mo-41Re first (very good, 70/100) then Mo-La (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Mo-41Re and Mo-La side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.